[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] How to correctly set up the request URI?
- To: "Creighton, Tom" <Tom_Creighton at cable.comcast.com>, <richard at shockey.us>, "Pfautz, Penn L, GBLAM" <ppfautz at att.com>, <speermint at ietf.org>, <enum at ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] How to correctly set up the request URI?
- From: "Stastny Richard" <Richard.Stastny at oefeg.at>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:48:50 +0200
- Cc:
- List-help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- Thread-index: AcaFfCUKMx50zyJCT9mhJO88vu1YDAACG1OAAALQARAAAEhP4AADaVbyAAAbobAAALkgMAABDqTDAAAGMDAAAFyItgAACowAADOBpmAAASpv0AACxYVAAABBo3AAJXTKwABkv/xgAAHQbNg=
- Thread-topic: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] How to correctly set up the request URI?
>> > Yes. Again, there might be exceptions, for example a business might want
>> > a URI with their name to be used and some SPs might agree to that, but
>> > generally the point of infrastructure ENUM is to be invisible to the
>> > user
>> >
>> Now the 64B question is the "infrastructure" URI invisible to the global
>> DNS?
>Who has the authority to make that decision? Is it the ITU, IETF, a
>combination of the two, or each country that opts to participate in
>Infrastructure ENUM? I think that is the 64B question
?
I am confused
Could anybody please explain to me what you are talking about
I cannot parse this thread
What is the "point of Infrastructure ENUM"?
What is an "Infrastructure URI" and why should it be invisible?
And what has this to do with an enterprise specific URI?
-sta
________________________________
Von: Creighton, Tom [mailto:Tom_Creighton at cable.comcast.com]
Gesendet: Mo 05.06.2006 17:15
An: richard at shockey.us; Pfautz, Penn L, GBLAM; James McEachern; Lee, Yiu; Stastny Richard; speermint at ietf.org; enum at ietf.org
Betreff: RE: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] How to correctly set up the request URI?
Who has the authority to make that decision? Is it the ITU, IETF, a
combination of the two, or each country that opts to participate in
Infrastructure ENUM? I think that is the 64B question.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Shockey [mailto:richard at shockey.us]
> Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 10:48
> To: 'Pfautz, Penn L, GBLAM'; 'James McEachern'; Creighton, Tom; Lee,
Yiu;
> 'Stastny Richard'; speermint at ietf.org; enum at ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] How to correctly set up the
request
> URI?
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pfautz, Penn L, GBLAM [mailto:ppfautz at att.com]
> > Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 4:56 PM
> > To: James McEachern; Creighton, Tom; Lee, Yiu; Stastny Richard;
> > speermint at ietf.org; enum at ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] How to correctly set up the
request
> > URI?
> >
> > Yes. Again, there might be exceptions, for example a business might
want
> > a URI with their name to be used and some SPs might agree to that,
but
> > generally the point of infrastructure ENUM is to be invisible to the
> > user
> >
>
>
> Now the 64B question is the "infrastructure" URI invisible to the
global
> DNS?
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speermint mailing list
> > Speermint at ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum