RE: [Enum] draft-lewis-peppermint-enum-reg-if-00

["Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck at verisign.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:fluffy at cisco.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 6:52 PM
> To: enum at ietf.org
> Subject: [Enum] draft-lewis-peppermint-enum-reg-if-00
> 
> 
> Ok, so i read this and got the idea that EPP is really bad but I got  
> no idea of what the problem folks want to solve is. I certainly have  
> no idea how to design a reasonable protocol to support it.

That's not the idea that *I* got out of reading the draft.

What I read: the current EPP ENUM RFC 4114 doesn't solve Ed's
provisioning problem.  He has worked with a SOAP-based legacy system
that does the job.  It doesn't make much sense to build an EPP-based
system when the SOAP-based system is already in place and working.
That's not the same thing as "SOAP good, EPP bad".

-Scott-

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum