Re: [Enum] draft-lewis-peppermint-enum-reg-if-00

[Cullen Jennings <fluffy at cisco.com>]

On Mar 10, 2007, at 6:36 PM, Richard Shockey wrote:

> Well ..I guess that is why we are not having a formal PEPPERMINT  
> BOF right?
>
> Cullen there is a community that wants to flush out the issues you  
> correctly
> point out here before Chicago.
>
> I want a meeting room in Prague to do this. If I ask the  
> Secretariat for a
> non official BOF will you approve it?

Hi,

I feel that this work area--or at least the requirements phase--is in- 
scope for SPEERMINT and we'd like to see it pursued there, at least  
to the point where there's a consensus that it's likely to be  
necessary to form a new working group.

However, if you feel that this discussion can't be had in the main  
SPEERMINT WG meeting and the chairs agree, I think the best way forward
would be for the SPEERMINT chairs to request an Ad-hoc meeting.  
Ultimately this is Jon's decision but if the chairs were in
favor and there was a slot where both Jon and I could make it, I  
would be supportive.

Cullen


_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum