Re: [Enum] Are we ready to go to WGLC on this?

[Peter Koch <pk at DENIC.DE>]

Hi Richard,

> But on second thought .. H.323 IETF has no change control over that either.
> That does establish some precedent.

sorry, that was misleading. My issue was a downref one, i.e., a spec that
is available as Informational RFC only (concluded from the current boilerplate)
would not allow the referencing document to advance past that. H.323 is
available as an ITU-T document and there's some formal liaison between
the IETF and ITU-T about references to documents.

> ON the issue of derivative works from a Informational standard .. I think
> I'll submit it as Proposed Standard and let the IESG sort out the issue,
> unless there is strong objection

Not here. And I agree some process advice might be helpful.

-Peter

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum