Re: [Enum] I-D Action: New draft - draft-bellis-enum-send-n-00

["Clive D.W. Feather" <clive at demon.net>]

Richard Shockey said:
> Lawrence I generally agree with the thrust of your analysis. I find it very
> difficult to support the use of 3761 for digit analysis. 3761 was designed
> to query on the full E.164 string not a partial string. We would be going
> down a rat hole we do not want to go, especially now.
> 
> ENUM is a pure 1 to 1 mapping from fully formed E.164 FQDN to URI's. The
> digit strings must be fully formed in advance before query not during.

You've declared that to be the case, but there's no a priori reason why it
has to be true.

In other words, what is the problem with extending 3761 to allow the
interior nodes of the tree to contain useful information?

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  <clive at demon.net>   | Tel:    +44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert     | Home:  <clive at davros.org>  | Fax:    +44 870 051 9937
Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
THUS plc            |                            |
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum