Re: [Enum] I-D Action: New draft - draft-bellis-enum-send-n-00

[Duane <duane at e164.org>]

Clive D.W. Feather wrote:

> The big benefit is that, given something looking like a phone number, you
> do *one* lookup and get back either the full ENUM record or the send-n
> record telling you that the number is incomplete.

Yes but you can't do that without breaking other DNS types so as the
other person pointed out regardless if you agree with it or not you
can't just pick and choose which DNS types are more important as they
are all deemed to be equal.

> With your approach, whenever the device has been given a full number, it
> has to do two separate lookups. That's a extra round trip.

I doubt you're approach will be allowed to become standardised if for no
other reason it breaks other DNS types so the benefit you are trying to
coax out isn't there at least won't be in RFCs.

-- 

Best regards,
 Duane
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum