Re: [Enum] I-D Action: New draft - draft-bellis-enum-send-n-00

["Richard Shockey" <richard at shockey.us>]

>  
>  I rather thought the point of this was that in the DNS it doesn't have
>  to
>  be centralized :)
>  
>  In the future hypothetical use case of multiple countries allowing
>  interconnection between their national portability databases [i.e. my
>  justification for trying to standardise this] then each database
>  administrator can publish their own portion of the E.164 numbering
>  plan.

But the point some of us are making is that you don't have to publish the
structure of the national dial plan in the DNS. This could be a out of band
process. You just need to know where to get the data.

>  
>  NB: I don't currently expect to see this in public ENUM, it really is
>  a  private ENUM application.  

Like duh .. :-) 

However it does have theoretical benefits
>  in  public ENUM, and several people have said the data would be useful
>  (even  if some of them aren't happy with the current proposed
>  implementation).
>  Hence I think it's worth making the effort to ensure that it wouldn't
>  break anything were it to be deployed.
>  
>  Ray
>  _______________________________________________
>  enum mailing list
>  enum at ietf.org
>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum