Re: [Enum] I-D Action: New draft - draft-bellis-enum-send-n-00

[Duane <duane at e164.org>]

Ray.Bellis at nominet.org.uk wrote:

> NB: I don't currently expect to see this in public ENUM, it really is a 
> private ENUM application.  However it does have theoretical benefits in 
> public ENUM, and several people have said the data would be useful (even 
> if some of them aren't happy with the current proposed implementation). 
> Hence I think it's worth making the effort to ensure that it wouldn't 
> break anything were it to be deployed.

Since public enum was messed with in the pass to try and bolt on an
infrastructure component maybe something similar could be done that
would allow both public enum to still have the possibility of wild
cards, while allowing send-n to be published as well without interfering
as well. Just a thought.

-- 

Best regards,
 Duane
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum