Re: [Enum] Meeting [Re: Trunk group document & Charter]

[Lawrence Conroy <lconroy at insensate.co.uk>]

Hi Richard, Peter, folks,
 yes we did (I do remember - likewise, can't recall which meeting  
though).
However, that was for the Enumservice that you just shot, which is  
within
the exclusive remit of the WG.
BUT...
---->
For the new approach to TG, and looking at point 6 para 2 of the ENUM  
Charter,
it's the AD that hums.
<----

As for any potential meeting -- I suspect that there would have been a  
good
half hour's worth of useful discussion just on the trunk group  
draft(s) and iax.
[particularly with regard to the way forward using the enumservice- 
guide]
The TG draft has raised a bunch of process issues, and having a  
friendly AD in
the house would have helped (i.e. to anoint it officially as  
appropriate under 6.2).

all the best,
  Lawrence


On 26 May 2009, at 18:58, Richard Shockey wrote:
> We did hum on trunkgroup as a WG item ..I think it was Philadelphia  
> I just
> need to find the note from the various meeting minutes.