Enum Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETFParis), James McEachern
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETFParis), Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
  • RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETFParis), Rosbotham, Paul
  • RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETFParis), Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
• [Enum] Enum and Bind?, Arnold Ligtvoet
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Enum] Enum and Bind?, Arnold Ligtvoet
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Enum] Enum and Bind?, Arnold Ligtvoet
• [Enum] Generic Enumservices required?, Stastny Richard
• [Enum] updated voipeer BOF agenda for IETF 63, David Meyer
  • [Enum] (updated) updated voipeer BOF agenda for IETF 63, David Meyer
• [Enum] [Fwd: IESG response to appeal regarding draft-ietf-lemonade-mms-mapping-04], Richard Shockey
  • Re: [Enum] [Fwd: IESG response to appeal regarding draft-ietf-lemonade-mms-mapping-04], lconroy
• [Enum] COMMENTS on draft-ra-shin-enum-mobileweb-01.txt, Ray Anderson
• [Enum] Required reading for IETF Paris, Richard Shockey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] Required reading for IETF Paris, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] Required reading for IETF Paris, Richard Shockey
  • RE: [Enum] Required reading for IETF Paris, Robert . Shaw
• [Enum] A shameless plug for my new job., Richard Shockey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Enum] A shameless plug for my new job., Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] A shameless plug for my new job., Richard Shockey
    • RE: [Enum] A shameless plug for my new job., henry
  • Re: [Enum] A shameless plug for my new job., Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] A shameless plug for my new job., Richard Shockey
  • RE: [Enum] A shameless plug for my new job., Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
• [Enum] [voipeer] updated voipeer BOF agenda for IETF 63, David Meyer