Enum Discussion Archive - Thread Index

• [Enum] combined user/infrastucture ENUM proposal - proof of concept implementation - updated to draft-haberler-carrier-enum-02 - CORRECTED, Michael Haberler
• [Enum] combined user/infrastucture ENUM proposal - proof of concept implementation - updated to draft-haberler-carrier-enum-02, Michael Haberler
• [Enum] FINAL AGENDA ENUM WG IETF 65 Dallas, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-experiences-04.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Enum] Ready for WG Last Call: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-validation-epp-03.txt?, Bernie Hoeneisen
• [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-haberler-carrier-enum-02.txt], Richard Shockey
  • Re: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-haberler-carrier-enum-02.txt], lconroy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-haberler-carrier-enum-02.txt], Stastny Richard
• [Enum] Almost complete Agenda for IETF 65 Dallas, Richard Shockey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Enum] Almost complete Agenda for IETF 65 Dallas, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] Almost complete Agenda for IETF 65 Dallas, Richard Shockey
      • [Enum] carrier-of-record, Tony Rutkowski
  • Re: [Enum] Almost complete Agenda for IETF 65 Dallas, Stastny Richard
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure-enum-reqs-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Enum] FYI ENUM and Speermint look solid for Monday., Richard Shockey
• [Enum] RFC 4414 on An ENUM Registry Type for the Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS), rfc-editor
• [Enum] RE: Section 3.2 of draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-00, Livingood, Jason
  • RE: [Enum] RE: Section 3.2 of draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-00, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Enum] RE: Section 3.2 of draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-00, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] RE: Section 3.2 of draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-00, lconroy
      • RE: [Enum] RE: Section 3.2 of draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-00, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
      • Re: [Enum] RE: Section 3.2 of draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-00, lconroy
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-validation-token-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • Re: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-00.txt, lconroy
    • Re: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-00.txt, Bernie Hoeneisen
• [Enum] Re: ENUM toolbar for Firefox, admin
• Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mahy-enum-im-service-00.txt, Stastny Richard
  • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mahy-enum-im-service-00.txt, lconroy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mahy-enum-im-service-00.txt, Stastny Richard
• [Enum] Cudos for the most successful ENUM implementation, Tony Rutkowski
• [Enum] Request for Publication - draft-ietf-enum-validation-arch-02.txt, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] No "Sender:"??, Lars-Johan Liman
  • Re: [Enum] No "Sender:"??, Tom-PT Taylor
• [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Stastny Richard
  • Message not available
    • Re: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Tony Rutkowski
      • Re: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Peter Williams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, James McEachern
    • RE: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
  • Re: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Stastny Richard
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Tony Rutkowski
  • Re: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, lconroy
  • RE: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
    • Re: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Richard Shockey
      • Re: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Tony Rutkowski
  • RE: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Mark Hewitt
    • RE: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Peter Williams
  • Re: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Lupton, Ronan
  • Re: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Richard Shockey
  • Re: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, Stastny Richard
  • Re: Re: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, kurt.reichinger
  • Re: Re: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, kurt.reichinger
  • RE: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, James McEachern
  • RE: [Enum] General question on Enumservices, James McEachern
• [Enum] RFC 4415 IANA Registration for Enumservice voice, Stastny Richard
• [Enum] Updated Preliminary Agenda IETF 65 Dallas - ENUM WG IETF Meeting Materials page, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-mahy-enum-calendar-service-00.txt], Richard Shockey
• [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-mayrhofer-enum-domainkeys-00.txt], Richard Shockey
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-validation-arch-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-mahy-enum-im-service-00.txt], Richard Shockey
  • [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mahy-enum-im-service-00.txt, Bernie Hoeneisen
    • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mahy-enum-im-service-00.txt, lconroy
      • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mahy-enum-im-service-00.txt, Bernie Hoeneisen
  • Message not available
    • [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mahy-enum-im-service-00.txt, chenhui
      • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mahy-enum-im-service-00.txt, lconroy
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-iax-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Enum] ENUM toolbar for Firefox, chenhui
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Enum] ENUM toolbar for Firefox, Stastny Richard
• [Enum] Preliminary Agenda IETF 65 Dallas - ENUM WG IETF Meeting Materials page, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] fyi - IETF65 enum session draft schedule, Alexander Mayrhofer
• [Enum] Reminder .. Agenda items for Dallas ..., Richard Shockey
  • Re: [Enum] Reminder .. Agenda items for Dallas ..., Alexander Mayrhofer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Enum] Reminder .. Agenda items for Dallas ..., Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] Reminder .. Agenda items for Dallas ..., Richard Shockey
  • Re: [Enum] Reminder .. Agenda items for Dallas ..., Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] Reminder .. Agenda items for Dallas ..., Richard Shockey
• [Enum] RE: RFC4114 <update> example breaks RFC3731?, Hollenbeck, Scott
• [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-reichinger-enum-foaf-00.txt], Richard Shockey
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-validation-epp-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Enum] RFC4114 <update> example breaks RFC3731?, Alexander Mayrhofer
  • Re: [Enum] RFC4114 <update> example breaks RFC3731?, Bernie Hoeneisen
    • Re: [Enum] RFC4114 <update> example breaks RFC3731?, Alexander Mayrhofer
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-validation-token-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Enum] "manual" I-D ACTION announcement for draft-ietf-enum-validation-token-01, Alexander Mayrhofer
• RE: [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on ENUM Validation Architecture, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on ENUM Validation Architecture, Mowafy, Hala
• [dhcwg] Re: DDNS IESG Issue resolution., Ted Lemon
• [Enum] Re: URI Portability, Stastny Richard
  • Re: [Enum] Re: URI Portability, Patrik Fältström
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] Re: URI Portability, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
  • Re: [Enum] Re: URI Portability, Stastny Richard
  • RE: [Enum] Re: URI Portability, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
  • Re: [Enum] Re: URI Portability, james . f . baskin
    • Re: [Enum] Re: URI Portability, Otmar Lendl
      • [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-validation-token-01.txt, Tony Rutkowski
      • [Enum] Re: draft-ietf-enum-validation-token-01.txt, Otmar Lendl
      • [Enum] Re: draft-ietf-enum-validation-token-01.txt, Tony Rutkowski
  • Re: [Enum] Re: URI Portability, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] Re: URI Portability, Patrik Fältström
  • RE: [Enum] Re: URI Portability, Tim Ruiz
  • RE: [Enum] Re: URI Portability, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
    • Re: [Enum] Re: URI Portability, Richard Shockey
      • Re: [Enum] Re: URI Portability, Otmar Lendl
  • RE: [Enum] Re: URI Portability, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
• [Enum] NITS review of draft-ietf-enum-validation-epp-02, Alexander Mayrhofer
• [Enum] Re: Request for Publication - draft-ietf-enum-pstn-03.txt, Allison Mankin
• [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on ENUM Validation Architecture, Richard Shockey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on ENUM Validation Architecture, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-validation-arch-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• RE: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUMs ignaling f lows, Stafford, Matthew
  • Re: [Speermint] RE: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUMs ignaling f lows, Klaus Darilion
• Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUMsignaling f lows, Stastny Richard
  • Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUMsignaling f lows, Richard Shockey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUMsignaling f lows, Stastny Richard
• RE: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Stafford, Matthew
  • Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Richard Shockey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Stafford, Matthew
  • RE: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Stafford, Matthew
    • Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Adrian Georgescu
  • RE: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Stafford, Matthew
    • Re: [Speermint] RE: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Duane
• RE: [Enum] RE: [Speermint] and are phone numbers a borken addressingsystem?, Robert . Shaw
  • Re: [Enum] RE: [Speermint] and are phone numbers a borken addressingsystem?, Alexander Mayrhofer
• [Enum] RE: [Speermint] and are phone numbers a borken addressing system?, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
  • [Enum] RE: [Speermint] and are phone numbers a borken addressing system?, Henry Sinnreich
• [Enum] input for Enumservice registration BCP sought, Alexander Mayrhofer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] input for Enumservice registration BCP sought, Livingood, Jason
    • Re: [Enum] input for Enumservice registration BCP sought, Alexander Mayrhofer
• [Enum] NITS review for draft-ietf-enum-validation-token-00, Alexander Mayrhofer
• RE: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags todistinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
  • Re: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags todistinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Duane
    • Re: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags todistinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Klaus Darilion
      • Re: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags todistinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Duane
• [Enum] Request for Publication - draft-ietf-enum-pstn-03.txt, Richard Shockey
• RE: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure E NUM?, Roy, Radhika R.
• [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Stafford, Matthew
  • Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, lconroy
    • Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Richard Shockey
    • Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Tony Rutkowski
      • RE: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Henry Sinnreich
      • Message not available
      • [Enum] ENUM Test Specificatiobns, Tony Rutkowski
      • Re: [Enum] ENUM Test Specificatiobns, Jim Reid
      • Re: [Enum] ENUM Test Specificatiobns, lconroy
      • Re: [Enum] ENUM Test Specificatiobns, Adrian Georgescu
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Richard Shockey
    • Re: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows, Dean Willis
• [Enum] WG: [Speermint] speermint now a working group, Stastny Richard
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-validation-epp-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Enum] United States ENUM Trial (1.e164.arpa) Launches Feburary 21, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Bernie Hoeneisen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Lind, Steven D, ALABS
  • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Stastny Richard
  • RE: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Rosbotham, Paul
  • RE: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Antoin Verschuren
    • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Jim Reid
      • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Richard Shockey
      • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Clive D.W. Feather
      • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Jim Reid
      • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Clive D.W. Feather
  • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Stastny Richard
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Tony Rutkowski
    • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Richard Shockey
  • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Richard Shockey
      • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, lconroy
      • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Richard Shockey
      • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Patrik Fältström
    • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Jim Reid
      • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Richard Shockey
  • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Richard Shockey
  • RE: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] Why not re-use interim procedures for infrastructure ENUM?, Patrik Fältström
• [Enum] [Fwd: Internet-Drafts Submission Cutoff Dates for the 65th IETF Meeting in Dallas, TX, USA], Richard Shockey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Enum] [Fwd: Internet-Drafts Submission Cutoff Dates for the 65th IETF Meeting in Dallas, TX, USA], Richard Shockey
• [Enum] Less than 60 days and counting to IETF Dallas -Agenda Items?, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] DENIC Launches Productive Phase of ENUM, Carsten Schiefner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] DENIC Launches Productive Phase of ENUM, Livingood, Jason
• [Enum] regulation of ENUM and VoIP callerID, Tony Rutkowski
• [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on IANA Registration for Enumservice Containing PSTN Signalling Information, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] RE: We approved yours loan, Teddy Dolan
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-pstn-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • [Enum] Desire to go to WGLC on - I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-pstn-03.txt, Richard Shockey
• Re: Re: [Enum] The use of "service type" and "subtype" fieldsin ENUM record, Wang Feng
• [Enum] The use of "service type" and "subtype" fieldsin ENUM record, chenhui
  • Re: [Enum] The use of "service type" and "subtype" fieldsin ENUM record, lconroy
    • Re: [Enum] The use of "service type" and "subtype" fieldsin ENUM record, Patrik Fältström
    • Message not available
      • Re: [Enum] The use of "service type" and "subtype" fieldsin ENUM record, chenhui
      • Re: [Enum] The use of "service type" and "subtype" fieldsin ENUM record, Patrik Fältström
      • Re: [Enum] The use of "service type" and "subtype" fieldsin ENUM record, lconroy
• [Enum] test, Paul Kyzivat
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Enum] test, Paul Kyzivat
• [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Richard Shockey
    • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Paul Kyzivat
      • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Richard Shockey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Richard Shockey
      • [Enum] CNAM on further reflection, Richard Shockey
      • Re: [Enum] CNAM on further reflection, lconroy
      • Re: [Enum] CNAM on further reflection, Richard Shockey
      • Re: [Enum] CNAM on further reflection, lconroy
      • Re: [Enum] CNAM on further reflection, Paul Kyzivat
      • Re: [Enum] CNAM on further reflection, Otmar Lendl
      • Re: [Enum] CNAM on further reflection, Patrik Fältström
  • RE: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Mowafy, Hala
    • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Richard Shockey
  • RE: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Mowafy, Hala
    • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Richard Shockey
      • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Paul Kyzivat
  • RE: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Livingood, Jason
  • RE: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Livingood, Jason
    • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Paul Kyzivat
      • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Richard Shockey
      • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Paul Kyzivat
      • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Richard Shockey
  • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt, Stastny Richard
• [Enum] For your generous consideration: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-shockey-enum-cnam-00.txt], Richard Shockey
• [Enum] Reminder IETF 65 Dallas, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] RFC 4355 on IANA Registration for Enumservices email, fax, mms, ems, and sms, rfc-editor
• Re: [Speermint] RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Stastny Richard
• RE: [Speermint] RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peer ingPolicy, Roy, Radhika R.
• RE: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP PeeringPolicy, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
  • Message not available
    • RE: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP PeeringPolicy, Michael Haberler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Speermint] RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP PeeringPolicy, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Speermint] RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP PeeringPolicy, lconroy
      • RE: [Speermint] RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP PeeringPolicy, Henry Sinnreich
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-pstn-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • Re: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-pstn-02.txt, Richard Shockey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-pstn-02.txt, Livingood, Jason
• [Enum] Re: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Richard Shockey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Michael Haberler
  • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Duane
    • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Otmar Lendl
      • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Henry Sinnreich
      • Message not available
      • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Otmar Lendl
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Dolly, Martin C
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Livingood, Jason
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, James McEachern
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Livingood, Jason
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
    • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Richard Shockey
    • Re: [Speermint] RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Tom-PT Taylor
• [Enum] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Michael Haberler
  • [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Henry Sinnreich
    • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Otmar Lendl
    • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, David Meyer
      • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Richard Shockey
      • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Henry Sinnreich
      • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Michael Haberler
      • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Henry Sinnreich
  • Re: [Enum] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Adrian Georgescu
    • [Enum] speermint at ietf.org is up (new "voipeer" list), David Meyer
• [Enum] Protocol Action: 'IANA Registration for Enumservice Voice' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• [Enum] Re: [Geopriv] ENUM input request, Andrew Newton
• [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-iptel-tel-reg-00.txt], Richard Shockey
• [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-iptel-tel-enumdi-02.txt], Richard Shockey
• RE: [WARNING: A/V UNSCANNABLE] RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
  • RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Henry Sinnreich
  • RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Henry Sinnreich
• Re: [voipeer] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Stastny Richard
  • Re: [voipeer] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Klaus Darilion
  • Re: [voipeer] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Cullen Jennings
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [voipeer] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [voipeer] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Klaus Darilion
      • Re: [voipeer] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Peter Williams
• Re: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Stastny Richard
  • Re: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Paul Kyzivat
    • Re: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Klaus Darilion
      • Re: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Paul Kyzivat
    • Re: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Juha Heinanen
      • Re: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Paul Kyzivat
      • Re: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Juha Heinanen
      • Re: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Paul Kyzivat
      • Re: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Juha Heinanen
      • Re: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Dale R. Worley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
  • RE: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Tolga Tarhan
    • Re: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Stastny Richard
• [Enum] NITS review request of draft-ietf-enum-vcard, Alexander Mayrhofer
• [Enum] RE: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, James McEachern
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Stastny Richard
• [Enum] WG Action: RECHARTER: Telephone Number Mapping (enum), The IESG
• [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Stastny Richard
  • Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Klaus Darilion
    • Re: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Paul Kyzivat
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [voipeer] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Klaus Darilion
  • Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Sip] Re: [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM - Second Try, Klaus Darilion
• RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
    • RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Henry Sinnreich
  • RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
    • RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Henry Sinnreich
  • RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
  • RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, James M. Polk
    • RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Henry Sinnreich
  • RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
    • RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Henry Sinnreich
    • RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Henry Sinnreich
  • RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Roy, Radhika R.
• [Enum] [voipeer] Revised VOIPEER Charter (note name change...), David Meyer
• [Enum] RE: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Stastny Richard
    • [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Klaus Darilion
      • Re: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Thilo Salmon
  • [Enum] RE: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
    • [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Klaus Darilion
  • [Enum] RE: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
  • RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
    • RE: [voipeer] RE: [Enum] Re: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Henry Sinnreich
  • [Enum] RE: [Sip] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
• [Enum] SIP AoR, tel and ENUM, Stastny Richard
  • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Henry Sinnreich
    • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] I-D: Publishing SIP Peering Policy, Jim Reid
• [Enum] Protocol Action: 'An ENUM Registry Type for the Internet Registry Information Service' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-pstn-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Enum] cablelabs & VoIP peering, Alexander Mayrhofer
• RE: [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, Stastny Richard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
  • RE: [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, Lupton, Ronan
  • Re: [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, Stastny Richard
  • RE: [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, McGarry, Tom
  • RE: [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
    • Re: [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, lconroy
      • Re: [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, Richard Shockey
      • Re: [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, lconroy
  • Re: [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, Stastny Richard
  • RE: [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, McGarry, Tom
  • RE: [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, Stastny Richard
• [Enum] Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
  • [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, Richard Shockey
    • RE: [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, Tim Dwight
      • Re: [Enum] Re: Update of Carrier ENUM requirements I-D, Patrik Fältström
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-vcard-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • Re: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-vcard-00.txt, Alexander Mayrhofer
• [Enum] IETF-64 Vancouver ENUM WG meeting minutes - Preliminary, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] Re: enum Digest, Vol 19, Issue 20 (Out of office), Philip Walls
• [Enum] vCard-draft - subtype considerations, Alexander Mayrhofer
• [Enum] Reminder to ID authors., Richard Shockey
  • RE: [Enum] Reminder to ID authors., Peter Williams
    • Re: [Enum] Reminder to ID authors., Tom-PT Taylor
• [Enum] [Fwd: RFC 4143 on Facsimile Using Internet Mail (IFAX) Service of ENUM], Richard Shockey
• RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session (re CNAM inE2U+PSTN), Mowafy, Hala
• RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session (re CNAM inE2U+PSTN), Mowafy, Hala
  • Re: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session (re CNAM inE2U+PSTN), Richard Shockey
• RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session (re CNAM in E2U+PSTN), Livingood, Jason
• [Enum] draft-haberler-carrier-enum-01, Cartwright, Kenneth
  • Re: [Enum] draft-haberler-carrier-enum-01, Richard Shockey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] draft-haberler-carrier-enum-01, Cartwright, Kenneth
• AW: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Stastny Richard
• [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Alexander Mayrhofer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Livingood, Jason
  • Re: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Stastny Richard
  • Re: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Stastny Richard
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, McCandless, Kevin
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Cartwright, Kenneth
  • Re: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Stastny Richard
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Cartwright, Kenneth
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Cartwright, Kenneth
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Cartwright, Kenneth
  • Re: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Stastny Richard
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Creighton, Tom
    • Re: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Jim Reid
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Creighton, Tom
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Cartwright, Kenneth
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, McCandless, Kevin
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Livingood, Jason
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Stastny Richard
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, McCandless, Kevin
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Schiefner, Carsten
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Livingood, Jason
    • Re: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Carsten Schiefner
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, James McEachern
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Livingood, Jason
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Schiefner, Carsten
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Stastny Richard
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Livingood, Jason
    • Re: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Richard Shockey
  • RE: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, Stastny Richard
    • Re: [Enum] please post issues from yesterdays session, lconroy
• [Enum] Location for the ENUM WG Slides and agenda for the meeting, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-jennings-iptel-tel-reg-00.txt], Richard Shockey
• [Enum] Reminder ... get your slides in ASAP, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] FYI: Last Call: 'Mapping Between the Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) and Internet Mail' to Proposed Standard, lconroy
• unsubscribe unsubscribe RE: RE: [Enum] There are preliinary plans for another ENUM Summit in the US., David
• [Enum] ENUM WG Chairs have determined that draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt is Out of Scope, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] WG Review: Recharter of Telephone Number Mapping (enum), The IESG
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Enum] WG Review: Recharter of Telephone Number Mapping (enum), Allison Mankin
• [Enum] ENUM Delegations this week, Stastny Richard
• RE: [Enum] Comment on draft-ietf-enum-voice-01.txt about callsneeding text capability, Roy, Radhika \(AEAD\)
  • RE: [Enum] Comment on draft-ietf-enum-voice-01.txt about calls needingtext capability, Gunnar Hellstrom
• [Enum] Comment on draft-ietf-enum-voice-01.txt about calls needing text capability, Gunnar Hellstrom
  • Re: [Enum] Comment on draft-ietf-enum-voice-01.txt about calls needing text capability, lconroy
    • RE: [Enum] Comment on draft-ietf-enum-voice-01.txt about calls needing text capability, Gunnar Hellstrom
• RE: [Enum] There are preliinary plans for another ENUM Summit in the US., Cartwright, Kenneth
• [Enum] [Fwd: RFC 4238 on Voice Message Routing Service], Richard Shockey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] [Fwd: RFC 4238 on Voice Message Routing Service], Creighton, Tom
• [Enum] There are preliinary plans for another ENUM Summit in the US., Richard Shockey
• [Enum] review of draft-ietf-enum-experiences-03.txt, Alexander Mayrhofer
• [Enum] [Fwd: [Iptel] IANA Registry Draft], Richard Shockey
• [Enum] Re: [Iptel] Do we need an IANA registry for tel parameters, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-pstn-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Enum] Presentation Materials for IETF 64 Vancouver, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] FINAL AGENDA ENUM WG IETF 64 Vancouver, Richard Shockey
  • RE: [Enum] FINAL AGENDA ENUM WG IETF 64 Vancouver, Peter Williams
• [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-shin-enum-emib-00.txt], Richard Shockey
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-validation-epp-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-conroy-enum-edns0-01.txt, Peter Koch
  • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-conroy-enum-edns0-01.txt, Jim Reid
    • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-conroy-enum-edns0-01.txt, Peter Koch
      • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-conroy-enum-edns0-01.txt, Jim Reid
    • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-conroy-enum-edns0-01.txt, Patrik Fältström
      • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-conroy-enum-edns0-01.txt, Jim Reid
      • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-conroy-enum-edns0-01.txt, lconroy
      • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-conroy-enum-edns0-01.txt, Patrik Fältström
      • Re: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-conroy-enum-edns0-01.txt, Patrik Fältström
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-conroy-enum-edns0-01.txt, Jean-Francois Mule
• [Enum] Re: enum Digest, Vol 18, Issue 49 (Out of office), Philip Walls
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [Enum] Re: enum Digest, Vol 18, Issue 49 (Out of office), Stastny Richard
• [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-haberler-carrier-enum-01.txt], Richard Shockey
• [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt], Richard Shockey
  • [Enum] comments on draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt, Klaus Darilion
    • [Enum] RE: comments on draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt, sajitha
  • Re: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt], Otmar Lendl
    • RE: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt], sajitha
      • Re: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt], Otmar Lendl
      • Re: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt], Jim Reid
      • Re: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt], Richard Shockey
      • Re: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt], Clive D.W. Feather
      • RE: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt], sajitha
      • Re: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt], Clive D.W. Feather
      • RE: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt], sajitha
      • Re: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt], Jim Reid
      • Re: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-sajitha-enum-api-00.txt], Richard Shockey
• [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lind-infrastructure-enum-reqs-01.txt], Richard Shockey
• [Enum] Last Call: 'IANA Registration for Enumservice Voice' to Proposed Standard, The IESG
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-voice-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
• [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-void-02.txt, Internet-Drafts
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-void-02.txt, Livingood, Jason
  • RE: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-void-02.txt, Stastny Richard
    • Message not available
      • RE: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-void-02.txt, Ray Anderson
  • RE: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-void-02.txt, Livingood, Jason
  • Re: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-void-02.txt, Stastny Richard
  • Re: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-void-02.txt, Conroy, Lawrence \(SMTP\)
  • RE: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-void-02.txt, Livingood, Jason
• [Enum] WG: I-D submission draft-haberler-carrier-enum-01, Stastny Richard
  • RE: [Enum] WG: I-D submission draft-haberler-carrier-enum-01, Peter Williams
• [Enum] Re: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Stastny Richard
  • [Enum] Re: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, David Meyer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
    • [Enum] Re: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, David Meyer
  • [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
  • [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
    • [Enum] Re: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, David Meyer
    • [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Henry Sinnreich
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Stastny Richard
  • [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
  • [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
    • Message not available
      • [Enum] Re: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, David Meyer
    • [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Henry Sinnreich
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
  • [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
  • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Stastny Richard
  • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Stastny Richard
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
    • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Peter Williams
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, James McEachern
    • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Henry Sinnreich
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Stastny Richard
  • [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Stastny Richard
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Livingood, Jason
  • [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Livingood, Jason
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, James McEachern
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, James McEachern
    • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, David Meyer
      • Re: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Peter Williams
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, James McEachern
    • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Henry Sinnreich
  • [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Henry Sinnreich
  • RE: [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
  • [Enum] RE: [voipeer] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
• [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-guy-enumiax-00.txt], Richard Shockey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-guy-enumiax-00.txt], Livingood, Jason
    • Re: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-guy-enumiax-00.txt], Ed Guy
• [Enum] draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-03.txt, David Meyer
• [Enum] What is this?, Richard Shockey
  • Re: [Enum] What is this?, Jim Reid
    • Re: [Enum] What is this?, Richard Shockey
• [Enum] Comments on draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-00.txt, Stastny Richard
  • [Enum] Re: Comments on draft-meyer-voipeer-terminology-00.txt, David Meyer
• RE: [Enum] [Fwd: I-Dsubmission:draft-lind-infrastructure-enum-reqs-01], Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
• [Enum] Pretty much Final WG Charter Revision, Richard Shockey
• RE: [Enum] [Fwd: I-D submission:draft-lind-infrastructure-enum-reqs-01], Pfautz, Penn L, NEO