Re: [Fecframe] FW: [MMUSIC] WGLC on draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-03
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fecframe] FW: [MMUSIC] WGLC on draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-03
Here is a quick update on the draft based on some comments from MMUSIC.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-04
Please review this one, if you are planning to do a review.
-acbegen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fecframe-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:fecframe-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ali C.
> Begen (abegen)
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 12:19 PM
> To: fecframe at ietf.org
> Subject: [Fecframe] FW: [MMUSIC] WGLC on draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-03
>
> This is the WGLC for the 4756bis draft.
>
> Recall that this is an essential update for the framework and needs to be approved before
> we can finalize the SDP draft. So, please review it and send your yeah/nah to
> mmusic at ietg.org.
>
> It is a short spec, won't take much time.
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-03
>
> Thanks, acbegen.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmusic-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois
> Mule
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 12:10 PM
> To: mmusic at ietf.org
> Cc: Joerg Ott; draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis at tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [MMUSIC] WGLC on draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-03
>
> This is to start a 2-week working group last call on draft
> draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-03,
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4756bis-03. The comment
> period will end on Wednesday October 28.
>
> Please send your comments to the mmusic list and the authors.
>
> Thank you,
> Jean-Francois.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> _______________________________________________
> Fecframe mailing list
> Fecframe at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.