Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options forLFB-level multicast]

["Weiming Wang" <wmwang at mail.hzic.edu.cn>]

Hi Jamal,

I hope the discussion on the path can be summarized your the presentation.
Obviously it is an important issue, actually I think the issue spent most of our
time discussing on since last IETF meeting.

Another is I hope you can add a few words on the LFB multicast when you talk
about the protocol grammar where LFB addressign format is included, so as to be
consistent with Robert's presentation.

Cheers,
Weiming

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi at znyx.com>
> Robert,
> I saw your presentation. Looks fine. Apologies, havent had time to work
> on the protocol one. I am trying not to have too many slides.
> Heres a start that i will refine later.
> I was trying to build upto a point where i could explain the different
> views of "path" - I will still do that if theres
> a) view i should  or b) time allows it
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
>



_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol