Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options forLFB-level multicast]

[Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi at znyx.com>]

Weiming,

I will do this.
Can you send me a slide or two on your idea of path - I just wanna make
sure i dont misrepresent it.

cheers,
jamal

On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 08:59, Weiming Wang wrote:
> Hi Jamal,
> 
> I hope the discussion on the path can be summarized your the presentation.
> Obviously it is an important issue, actually I think the issue spent most of our
> time discussing on since last IETF meeting.
> 
> Another is I hope you can add a few words on the LFB multicast when you talk
> about the protocol grammar where LFB addressign format is included, so as to be
> consistent with Robert's presentation.
> 
> Cheers,
> Weiming
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi at znyx.com>
> > Robert,
> > I saw your presentation. Looks fine. Apologies, havent had time to work
> > on the protocol one. I am trying not to have too many slides.
> > Heres a start that i will refine later.
> > I was trying to build upto a point where i could explain the different
> > views of "path" - I will still do that if theres
> > a) view i should  or b) time allows it
> >
> > cheers,
> > jamal
> >
> >
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol