[Forces-protocol] Re: Protocol presentation comments

[Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi at znyx.com>]

Hormuzd,

Can you point me to exactly what you dont like about the two slides
i put on the TML?
More importantly point me to my "opinions" on those two slides.
I will not remove the slides on TML - I think its a fundamental part of
ForCES. If you have something specific to point to, it would be valuable
to consider.

cheers,
jamal



On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 16:37, Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote:
> Hi Jamal,
> 
> I went thru the protocol presentation that you put together...
> 
> One comment, you should not be presenting your opinions on the TML
> drafts which are being presented at this meeting. This is beyond the
> scope of the protocol draft anyways, I am not sure why you have slides
> on this? But it would strongly recommend against this. I don't believe
> these have been discussed by the protocol team in emails or meetings.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Hormuzd
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jamal Hadi Salim [mailto:hadi at znyx.com] 
> Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 4:25 PM
> To: Robert Haas
> Cc: Weiming Wang; Khosravi, Hormuzd M; Avri Doria; Dong Ligang; (Ram
> Gopal )
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options
> forLFB-level multicast]
> 
> Robert,
> I saw your presentation. Looks fine. Apologies, havent had time to work
> on the protocol one. I am trying not to have too many slides.
> Heres a start that i will refine later. 
> I was trying to build upto a point where i could explain the different
> views of "path" - I will still do that if theres 
> a) view i should  or b) time allows it
> 
> cheers,
> jamal
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol