Re: [Forces-protocol] manageabilty
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Forces-protocol] manageabilty



I think also it is a sound thing to do.

-Robert

avri at acm.org wrote:

hi,

For those of you at the Routing Meeting last night, you saw the discussion on adding a manageability section to routing area drafts. The suggestion that came out of the meeting was that we should find a few docs to try this out on. The co-authors decided that we should be the first to try this - make us take our own medicine first.

so as one of the co-authors of the draft:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-rtg-manageability- requirements-00.txt
and a co-author of this draft, I feel I should volunteer myself to write such a section. But before I do so, I wanted to make sure that this was ok with you all.


Please let me know.

thanks
a.


_______________________________________________ Forces-protocol mailing list Forces-protocol at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol



-- Robert Haas IBM Zurich Research Laboratory Säumerstrasse 4 CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Switzerland phone +41-1-724-8698 fax +41-1-724-8578 http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~rha


_______________________________________________ Forces-protocol mailing list Forces-protocol at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.