Re: [Forces-protocol] manageabilty
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Forces-protocol] manageabilty
I think also it is a sound thing to do.
-Robert
avri at acm.org wrote:
hi,
For those of you at the Routing Meeting last night, you saw the
discussion on adding a manageability section to routing area drafts.
The suggestion that came out of the meeting was that we should find a
few docs to try this out on. The co-authors decided that we should
be the first to try this - make us take our own medicine first.
so as one of the co-authors of the draft:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-rtg-manageability-
requirements-00.txt
and a co-author of this draft, I feel I should volunteer myself to
write such a section. But before I do so, I wanted to make sure that
this was ok with you all.
Please let me know.
thanks
a.
_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol
--
Robert Haas
IBM Zurich Research Laboratory
Säumerstrasse 4
CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Switzerland
phone +41-1-724-8698 fax +41-1-724-8578 http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~rha
_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.