Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options forLFB-level multicast]

["Wang,Weiming" <wmwang at mail.hzic.edu.cn>]

Jamal,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi at znyx.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options forLFB-level
multicast]


> On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 09:03, Wang,Weiming wrote:
> > Joel,
> >
> > One more thing is, for index based searching, after some operation such as
add,
> > delete and modify, the table actually will also become a random table rather
> > than a linear one regarding the index.
>
> This is not the case as has been discussed so far (in the document
> posted by Steve/Zsolt as well as followup by me).
> Index can be specified by the operation.
> In the case index is not specified, the next available one is used.
> How this is achieved or rules is discussed in those two documents.
I just see random index is unavoidable regardless of rules used.
>
> I am sorry cant participate in the rest of the discussion because i
> still dont see the differences. I would suggest we put a time limit to
> this discussion so we can move to the big one which is data encoding.
> Shall we say two weeks from now as the deadline?
>
> Or maybe i should start the discussion on encoding in parallel?
That's fine.

Cheers,
Weiming
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>



_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol