[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-05
"Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@commscope.com> Tue, 11 October 2011 06:11 UTC
Return-Path: <Martin.Thomson@commscope.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6561621F8D72 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.900, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ASUtKILeBGrD for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cdcsmgw01.commscope.com (fw.commscope.com [198.135.207.129]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0251821F8D88 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 0a0404e8-b7c2eae000002297-35-4e93de23c763
Received: from ACDCE7HC1.commscope.com ( [10.86.20.102]) by cdcsmgw01.commscope.com (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id D1.6C.08855.32ED39E4; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:11:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from CDCE10HC1.commscope.com (10.86.28.21) by ACDCE7HC1.commscope.com (10.86.20.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.192.1; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:11:46 -0500
Received: from SISPE7HC2.commscope.com (10.97.4.13) by CDCE10HC1.commscope.com (10.86.28.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.339.1; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:11:45 -0500
Received: from SISPE7MB1.commscope.com ([fe80::9d82:a492:85e3:a293]) by SISPE7HC2.commscope.com ([fe80::58c3:2447:f977:57c3%10]) with mapi; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:11:41 +0800
From: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@commscope.com>
To: "draft-ietf-codec-guidelines.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-codec-guidelines.all@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:11:37 +0800
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-05
Thread-Index: AcyH3KIoiQprGFcRS1C6x67PZ6+FOw==
Message-ID: <27AFD040F6F8AA4193E0614E2E3AF9C910D2F0CCC0@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org Review Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:11:49 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-codec-guidelines-05 Reviewer: Martin Thomson Review Date: 2011-10-11 IETF LC End Date: 2011-10-19 Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as an Informational RFC, but has nits that should be considered before publication. Nits: This document describes a process that seems to touch on points in 2026 and other BCPs. It does not clearly identify whether this process is _different_, or whether the intent is to simply explain the application of the BCPs with codec-specific elaboration. It would appear that it's the latter, but I'm far from expert in these matters. A short statement identifying the which choice, and the intent of any differences (if any) would be helpful. Nitty nits: Missing citation for ITU-R BS.1534 (MUSHRA) Missing expansion on first use of several acronyms (e.g., PESQ, PEAQ, and SegSNR)
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-codec-guid… Thomson, Martin