IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-port-09.txt

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Tue, 01 November 2011 23:24 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDA711E80C9 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MlY+yHTDKLXh for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8A711E80C7 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.178]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id pA1NNwwl004074; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 18:23:59 -0500
Received: from [142.133.10.107] (147.117.20.214) by smtps-am.internal.ericsson.com (147.117.20.178) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.137.0; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 19:23:53 -0400
Message-ID: <4EB07E42.4020800@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:18:26 -0400
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110921 Thunderbird/3.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-pim-port.all@tools.ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-pim-port-09.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 23:24:06 -0000

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-pim-port-09.txt
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan
Review Date: 2011/11/01
IESG Telechat date: 2011/11/03

Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as an
Experimental RFC but I have a few comments.

Minor
=====

Section 3.1

* From my reading of the document, it is not clear whether we can have a
node advertise multiple capability options of the same transport
protocol (say PIM-over-TCP-Capable) in the same message. e.g. A dual
stack node might want to advertise its capability to do both IPv4 and
IPv6. Is this possible? If so, how?

Section 4.7

* Section 4 talks about the router with the lower connection ID
initiating the transport layer connection but this does not really map
into the rules mentioned in Section 4.7. Specifically, I am not sure
Rule 3 for Node A in Section 4.7 conveys the same intent as section 4.

Thanks
Suresh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email