[Gen-art] Fwd: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-04
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 24 May 2012 22:49 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5260121F8533 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2012 15:49:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.294, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_6CONS_WORD=0.356]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4bXsYPbDgkYW for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2012 15:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7414C21F8532 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 15:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkty8 with SMTP id y8so295548bkt.31 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 May 2012 15:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9ShSwPjBfcWeh9x2AFrefXgf3IoyJ4c9qQkPeCGxwKw=; b=wuO2vqtHsUnkmlNn6v8rOlDwjum4bAVJtgJSQJMwKLfOA44kh6gdvTDHBo+mzpWDEA sakq6WX+bAxpDOsdw+tg9lJ+hv9gRJiLEwTB2wBNgj0u/TpLfpOqXxy3dT57KcZbFvVY NX4j2sT2VsqVTAojgx1Y3x+GeFQyYpEG4Znb5OGewdjnoGdWhC81eRJks0V8v+ikQZ19 GxYxfwcZR42gFRTUi7jcdt872NrCvxnOL+gvDnrRxsOAfPNj2jmJ1Iiv7+c1aNg1LDMz AsKX4wrzWrWHuRFBnTYUFvaYpCa7nVJ/BedyAm4kcpzwUnFCaSgF8/H8s1b+HN/WrbYQ z1cg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.150.84 with SMTP id x20mr500224bkv.26.1337899746471; Thu, 24 May 2012 15:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.66.4 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 15:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXOM28=vT_PWhBwDE3T=KNoYhRJEnqv455YGC2eXF0AfQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnXOM28=vT_PWhBwDE3T=KNoYhRJEnqv455YGC2eXF0AfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 15:49:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUWX2v1WyUSRFsWTC3we_FnUmVR0HwPTEqzrVYAqDyFOA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Gen-art] Fwd: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 22:49:08 -0000
Feature request for the tool: a place to put reviews so that I don't keep forgetting to CC the gen-art list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Date: 20 May 2012 19:34 Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-04 To: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss.all@tools.ietf.org I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-04 Reviewer: Martin Thomson Review Date: 2012-05-20 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This draft clarifies a point of potential confusion around the use of the TCP MSS. The draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC, with a couple of nits. Major issues: none Minor issues: none Nits/editorial comments: Opinion... The draft seems a little long. Section 4 contains the only truly crucial point: namely the one made after the matrix. That alone, plus the short description in Section 2, seems sufficient. The appendix is excessive. Section 6 does not contain security considerations. It need not contain anything. Sections 3 and 5 have extra indentation for their subsections. The table in Section 4 has a wayward period.
- [Gen-art] Fwd: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-… Martin Thomson