[Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap
<kathleen.moriarty@emc.com> Fri, 25 May 2012 16:50 UTC
Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty@emc.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C7421F8743; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2mJtkgR8dAFp; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:50:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3009321F873E; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI01.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.54]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q4PGoGRu008804 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 25 May 2012 12:50:18 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.221.145]) by hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 25 May 2012 12:50:07 -0400
Received: from mxhub30.corp.emc.com (mxhub30.corp.emc.com [128.222.70.170]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q4PGo5w9021493; Fri, 25 May 2012 12:50:05 -0400
Received: from mx15a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.101]) by mxhub30.corp.emc.com ([128.222.70.170]) with mapi; Fri, 25 May 2012 12:50:05 -0400
From: kathleen.moriarty@emc.com
To: gen-art@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap.all@tools.ietf.org
Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 12:50:04 -0400
Thread-Topic: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap
Thread-Index: Ac06lm7XJrUTB2x+Q0i/7unKvG9rkg==
Message-ID: <F5063677821E3B4F81ACFB7905573F24018A6373@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EMM-MHVC: 1
Cc: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, tphelan@sonusnet.com
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:50:28 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-dccp-udpencap
Reviewer: Kathleen Moriarty
Review Date: 5/25/12
IETF LC End Date: 5/25/12
IESG Telechat date: (if known)
Summary: The document is ready with the exception of fixing some references noted below.
This document specifies an alternative encapsulation of the Datagram
Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP), referred to as DCCP-UDP. This
encapsulation allows DCCP to be carried through the current
generation of Network Address Translation (NAT) middleboxes without
modification of those middleboxes. This document also updates the
SDP information for DCCP defined in RFC 5762.
Sorry for the late review, I just saw this today!
Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments: The document reads well, but there are some references that need to be addressed, some removed and one should use the newer reference:
Confirmed this one does not appear in text:
== Unused Reference: 'RFC5234' is defined on line 758, but no explicit
reference was found in the text
The following one is OK, I am not sure why the checker doesn't see the reference in the text.
== Unused Reference: 'RFC4585' is defined on line 786, but no explicit
reference was found in the text
Confirmed this one does not appear in text:
== Unused Reference: 'RFC4762' is defined on line 791, but no explicit
reference was found in the text
Update the obsolete reference:
** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 4234 (Obsoleted by RFC 5234)
_______________________________________________
- [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-dccp-udpen… kathleen.moriarty