Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri-03

Peter Saint-Andre <psaintan@cisco.com> Wed, 06 March 2013 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <psaintan@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D49F21F8522 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:39:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PFcGx3VNgj0I for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:39:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1E421F89BF for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:39:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1215; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1362591572; x=1363801172; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=FOtX4ro4mzemnguW+B4pbwPa+V8kSTmWEvueoqJZXt0=; b=LYE+J7yyDlFoe/cX5JEMf6Elo7ilBH697yhHrqeZSfSZ27EvF2jAOjit +rioQ3aX/7V8L2xutBeQSTdjU++oPsyxYvw4Zm7L8EFXRmNIW5XTEj2ca t3mvOM6Ot/MVWEZfaMk1fglzJeYmD0yleA0vPEFjDv3fRKFAbQFBFiaQ6 o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAGR+N1GrRDoG/2dsb2JhbABExEaBWhZzgisBAQR5EAstGVcGiCW9C45ZMwcKglVhA4hsjV+FeIp4gyg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,795,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="71350804"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2013 17:39:30 +0000
Received: from [10.129.24.65] ([10.129.24.65]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r26HdTMm025210; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:39:30 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Peter Saint-Andre <psaintan@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+W=PEeuEKzGeiCCG+pg2RncbmW4e4Uv_PrtYu0hVtjGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:39:32 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <899A7848-FABF-443D-8337-C02CF80728DE@cisco.com>
References: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A09CF57@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <A0B59580-A3C0-4182-8348-5052D16FC6C7@cisco.com> <CALaySJ+W=PEeuEKzGeiCCG+pg2RncbmW4e4Uv_PrtYu0hVtjGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:39:36 -0000

On Mar 6, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:

>>> [Page 5] Section 5, "..access to personally identifying information..", do
>>> you mean "..access to identifiable personal information" ?
>> 
>> Looking at draft-iab-privacy-considerations, I think "personal data" might
>> be best.
> 
> Maybe.  But "PII" is a term of art, and it means something different
> to (and more specific than) "personal data".  I'm not sure whether the
> change is the right answer in the full context of the paragraph:
> 
>   Protocols that make use of 'acct' URIs are responsible for defining
>   security considerations related to such usage, e.g., the risks
>   involved in dereferencing an 'acct' URI and the authentication and
>   authorization methods that could be used to control access to
>   personally identifying information associated with a user's account
>   at a service.
> 
> I suppose, as I mull it over, that changing to "personal data"
> probably *is* right.  But people should speak up if they think
> otherwise.

Yes, I think "personal data" is what we really mean here, not personally identifiable information (such as IP addresses and mother's maiden name).

Peter