[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09
Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> Thu, 04 April 2013 02:54 UTC
Return-Path: <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EDC11E80A2 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yOnU-N1BUpJd for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:54:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F3721F8EA5 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-b7f0d6d00000097e-62-515ceb4cc427
Received: from EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.96]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 89.16.02430.C4BEC515; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 04:54:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.124]) by EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.96]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 22:54:04 -0400
From: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
To: "draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal.all@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09
Thread-Index: Ac4w3VrszGs7IiSEQICoRYrVRTJQmQ==
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 02:54:03 +0000
Message-ID: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A0B644B@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.135]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A0B644Beusaamb107ericsso_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPgq7v65hAg+nzhSw+vLvNanH11WcW ByaPJUt+Mnl8ufyZLYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSvj2LsFjAWL9CoWPnjG0sB4UaOLkYNDQsBE 4vBDyy5GTiBTTOLCvfVsXYxcHEICRxkljv57AeUsY5R4eLWBDaSKTcBCYvvv56wgtohApcTX bVvBbGYBTYlNTc/BaoQFfCTap9xlhqgJlvj5/ywThK0ncbV5AVgNi4CKxK6jvWA2r4C3xMZb p8FqGIGu+H5qDRPETHGJW0/mM0FcJyCxZM95ZghbVOLl43+sELayxPc5j1gg6vMlOvfuYIKY KShxcuYTlgmMwrOQjJqFpGwWkjKIuI7Egt2f2CBsbYllC18zw9hnDjxmQhZfwMi+ipGjtDi1 LDfdyGATIzBKjkmw6e5g3PPS8hCjNAeLkjhvkOuFACGB9MSS1OzU1ILUovii0pzU4kOMTByc Ug2MWTHix2s/Rs+6cj9pvqV01Zz0t7/uCp3kFl/0u/Rmr074XqMNftVzzp5bc604U8vrdjhb jGPcveolM+ev4bvJs7HJfsWNshKBjds/PHZczaAYPuP3243tN96+KFatyMk+fcLw5oacGyGt f4yFz1Rcrn9bpch0IiB/jVxD2NaYCoG+m1dqgr7MU2Ipzkg01GIuKk4EAEyuScRgAgAA
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 02:54:06 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09 Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour Review Date: 2013-04-03 IETF LC End Date: 2013-04-03 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is almost ready to be published as Standard RFC but I do have some editorial comments. Nits/editorial comments: - Reading the abstract does not tell why these options are necessary. The 4th paragraph in Intro mentions the purpose of these options as well as Section 8. Please consider adding a similar sentence as Section 8 to the abstract: "The proposed extensions allow the signaling of new algorithm uptake in client code to allow zone administrators to know when it is possible to complete an algorithm rollover in a DNSSEC signed zone." -[Page 4], last sentence: "in a potential future example". Suggestion: "in potential future examples". -[Page 7], Section 9, [I-D.ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0], latest version is 10. Best Regards, Meral --- Meral Shirazipour Ericsson Research www.ericsson.com
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-… Meral Shirazipour
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-i… Jari Arkko