Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps-05
"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Wed, 05 June 2013 04:57 UTC
Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4D121F9371; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 21:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BzZM1h2j0c2L; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 21:57:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEF721F93F8; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 21:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hn14so4419258wib.2 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 21:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=DN7HQiaS+cJ6gFfXZNjWwjPAjjmZKuDdC//HQjp+Fjg=; b=Ct+90WIIhjARVq40FyI97CIL5kg7bAWd0bekEBRik57qJhrDNyLUsrXnlzmABNgBWo Qh1rjdHJRJCaQ21dfV19DqkyOUSH1E4YWls0tLgvwytXimHqcUJj/SK4VkPAYHUfjVMN M5iPJDdBknWkrDo9Y7w1+3ZRvYUVlYgfc2f2J8pQtHDLdDwSXbVvFEudPuuXhh1R6b2I a5e0yzTKnwDsypulokWGDIChEjyGtJkGkByjZoMR0TM46t1iOeVKw0NSDiHNdkXstdVa 9NySu7tRk8V+sPwT0tHpz0JwEdtGj90l3eKNpfAZiAnGaCg/0PCOjSc+v2hkUPopL7pc TiCQ==
X-Received: by 10.180.198.140 with SMTP id jc12mr4468790wic.53.1370408251521; Tue, 04 Jun 2013 21:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RoniE ([109.64.225.31]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b11sm7447741wiv.10.2013.06.04.21.57.29 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Jun 2013 21:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com, draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps.all@tools.ietf.org
References: <000301ce5c98$278d0220$76a70660$@gmail.com> <D09DAE6B636851459F7575D146EFB54B2405E4B4@008-AM1MPN1-026.mgdnok.nokia.com> <027001ce60b1$ba2ecbf0$2e8c63d0$@gmail.com> <D09DAE6B636851459F7575D146EFB54B2406EA58@008-AM1MPN1-025.mgdnok.nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <D09DAE6B636851459F7575D146EFB54B2406EA58@008-AM1MPN1-025.mgdnok.nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 07:56:16 +0300
Message-ID: <031901ce61a9$04af7ce0$0e0e76a0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_031A_01CE61C2.29FE1470"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQD2ctd9kjZ9dlpMJt4mULENla+sLwGDWn0oAPcibgECiupmU5quQQiQ
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 04:57:35 -0000
Hi Simo, This will be OK Roni From: Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com [mailto:Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com] Sent: 04 June, 2013 9:48 AM To: ron.even.tlv@gmail.com; draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps.all@tools.ietf.org Cc: ietf@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps-05 Would adding a statement like this at the end of 3.1.2 address your concern: Exceptions for other network types, such as for the "ATM" network type defined in [RFC3108], require additional specifications. Regards, Simo From: ext Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com] Sent: 4. kesäkuuta 2013 2:26 To: Veikkolainen Simo (Nokia-CTO/Espoo); draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps.all@tools.ietf.org Cc: ietf@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps-05 Hi Simo, For the PSTN case the document explain how to construct the m-line PSTN is used based on the ccap using port 9. This is not specified for the ATM case. So if it is not mentioned it should be clear that using ccap for ATM is not specified and need another document Roni From: Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com [mailto:Simo.Veikkolainen@nokia.com] Sent: 31 May, 2013 1:14 PM To: ron.even.tlv@gmail.com; draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps.all@tools.ietf.org Cc: ietf@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps-05 Hello Roni, Please see my answer below prefixed with [SV]. From: ext Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com] Sent: 29. toukokuuta 2013 21:13 To: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps.all@tools.ietf.org Cc: ietf@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps-05 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps-05 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2013529 IETF LC End Date: 2013-64 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as Standard track RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: 1. I can understand from the draft that when you have IP and PSTN nettype it is requires that the ccap will be for the PSTN. What happens if you want to have the ccap nettype as ATM to be used with IP in the c= [SV] If either endpoint does not support ATM, the c= line with the ATM address would not get used (either it is not offered, or the Answerer removes that from the SDP configurations). In case both endpoints actually support and want to use ATM as alternative to IP based bearer, the conventions in RFC3108 would need to be followed when crafting the SDP configurations. That said, I havent taken a detailed look at RFC3108 to see if the ATM based media can be negotiated using the SDP Capability Negotiation framework and its current extensions. Simo Nits/editorial comments:
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-… Roni Even
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmu… Simo.Veikkolainen
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmu… Roni Even
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmu… Simo.Veikkolainen
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmu… Roni Even
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmu… Jari Arkko