[Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-03
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Thu, 19 September 2013 11:09 UTC
Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C4F21F8B35 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.254
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.254 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.345, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id reSPeOdmTXIt for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6882F21F8A67 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 04:09:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvUJALjZOlKHCzI1/2dsb2JhbABbgmYhOFKsY5RJgSEWdIInAQEDEihRARUHDhRCJgEEARoah2EBC50cnFuPNoNWgQADmSuFKYsdgySCKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,936,1371096000"; d="scan'208";a="24586380"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.53]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2013 07:09:00 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.13]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2013 07:00:43 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC03.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.13]) with mapi id 14.03.0146.000; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 07:08:58 -0400
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit.all@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-03
Thread-Index: Ac61KKKiH4rNLWTNTpGu7+l2OkPm3A==
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:08:57 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128DEB7F@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.46]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:09:10 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-6man-ext-transmit-03 Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 9/19/2013 IETF LC End Date: 9/20/2013 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: Ready (with one minor issue for clarification) The document is very well written, clearly justified, and the actions required from IANA are described in details together with their rationale. Major issues: Minor issues: I have only one procedural issue, which should be evaluated IMO by the IESG but should not prevent the document to be approved. Runing id-nits flags a downref because of a normative reference to RFC 5201 (experimental). I see that this was also mentioned in the shepherd submission. However the downref was not mentioned in the IETF LC. Note that I would be fine also with moving this reference to an Informational Reference as it only provides a pointer for one of the initial values in the Extension Header Types registry Nits/editorial comments:
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-6man-ext-… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)