[Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-05

Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com> Tue, 02 September 2014 13:21 UTC

Message-ID: <5405C417.3010209@dial.pipex.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:20:23 +0100
From: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General area reviewing team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/HA61JoXu98xMC5jUB7C1hJiPkTI
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-05
Precedence: list

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path-05.txt
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review Date: 29 August 2014
IETF LC End Date: 22 August 2014
IESG Telechat date: 4 September 2014

Summary:
Al Morton has shown me a set of changes that seem to address the points 
I made in my Last Call review.  Assuming they make it into -06 that'll 
be fine by me.

For the record, I didn't have the same problem as Barry and Adrian did 
with the term 'reference path'. My view was that it looked like a 
'reference point' and I know what one of those is.  But a little more 
explanation would doubtless help.

Regards,
Elwyn

[Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-ietf-i… Elwyn Davies