IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-03.txt

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Wed, 29 October 2014 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6F31A0103 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 06:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_I_LETTER=-2, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KzqfZXOWux9m for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 06:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A4A21A00C5 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 06:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id s9TDuBvb069017; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:56:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201410291356.s9TDuBvb069017@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:56:11 +0100
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/mVRTeRcXBXZQwW7J2leS2zesE5w
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-03.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:56:15 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-03.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20141025
IETF LC End Date: 20141027
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - ToC page 2 and 5 page 18: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 3.2.6 page 8: singaling -> signaling

 - 3.3.1 page 9: e.g. -> e.g.,

 - 3.3.2.4.1 pages 11 and 12: the conclusion (Gap: None) doesn't seem
  very in phase with the text. Perhaps it is another case of "out of scope
  known gap"?

 - 3.4.2 page 15 (UK vs US spelling): behaviour -> behavior

 - 4 page 17: Identifed -> Identified

 - 6 pages 18 and 19, Authors' Addresses page 26: I don't like
  ISO IS 3166 two letter codes used in postal addresses but it seems
  to be what the new RFC required...

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr

PS: I reviewed the 02 version but now the 03 was published so I updated
my comments. rfcdiff shows 03 is better than 02 at the exception of:
 - in 3.3.1.1 page 9 perhaps a missing '<' as I can see:
    ... (see xref    
    target="LDP"/>).
PPS: it could be useful to have a checklist of all RFCs which should
be updated but it is more a task for the WG than something to put
in the document (I don't follow the WG so I don't know if it already
exists :-).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email