[Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review for draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Mon, 13 June 2016 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6229A12D65E for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 05:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.356
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.356 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kPZrM0G3O0p6 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 05:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E82DC12D635 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 05:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2DhBQBVq15X/yYyC4dcHoJSIS0iNH0GAbsggW8KFwEJhXYCgS45EwEBAQEBAQFlJ4RNAQMSGz4OEgEVBw5WJgEEDg0aiA4BDZ15myYBAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBAQEBHoYoiQ4eHoILC0AYgi8FmGEBhgOKDU6EBIMghUWPbh8BNIFMgiJuAQEBiEMrGAF+AQEB
X-IPAS-Result: A2DhBQBVq15X/yYyC4dcHoJSIS0iNH0GAbsggW8KFwEJhXYCgS45EwEBAQEBAQFlJ4RNAQMSGz4OEgEVBw5WJgEEDg0aiA4BDZ15myYBAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBAQEBHoYoiQ4eHoILC0AYgi8FmGEBhgOKDU6EBIMghUWPbh8BNIFMgiJuAQEBiEMrGAF+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,466,1459828800"; d="scan'208,217";a="158203277"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 13 Jun 2016 08:49:03 -0400
X-OutboundMail_SMTP: 1
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.11]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 13 Jun 2016 08:49:02 -0400
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC01.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.11]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:44:50 +0200
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART telechat review for draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc
Thread-Index: AdHFaxviiYg0gwG1S1WzUN+KeL0mbw==
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:44:49 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA7520CC96@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.47]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA7520CC96AZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/98_5Q9-JgTF7WsVhNCJIG8JSW8o>
Cc: "draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review for draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:49:38 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.



For more information, please see the FAQ at



< https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__wiki.tools.ietf.org_area_gen_trac_wiki_GenArtfaq&d=CwICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=Z1Ci5uE-4lhATFG7ChwKJaQM5v75uVP9xIhq6-Yh7Os&s=fsaREMU4kl-9bvtGk1PwZgOFoAIbrkafiT3tUWZsu30&e=%20> >.


Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-routing-large-dc

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu

Review Date: 6/13

IETF LC End Date: 6/6

IESG Telechat date: 6/16



Summary:

The document is ready. It explains in a clear and detailed manner the operational experience in the design of large data centers using L3 only devices, Clos topology and BGP as routing protocol. I am not a routing expert, so I cannot validate all the statements made in the document, but the explanation seems clear and makes sense. The only comment I had in my IETF LC review was related to the lack of expansion of some of the acronyms (e.g. ASN, FIB ,etc.) - the issue was fixed in the revised version (11).



Major issues:



Minor issues:



Nits/editorial comments: