[Geopriv] Privacy Discussions @ IETF#73 --> CANCELED

"Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 18 November 2008 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <geopriv-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: geopriv-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-geopriv-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BED3A68F3; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:18:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA9F3A68F3 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:18:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.258
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.258 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.273, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.069]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VyPzQNIixRCX for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:18:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BFB33A682E for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2008 18:18:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (EHLO 4FIL42860) [130.129.31.217] by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 18 Nov 2008 19:18:12 +0100
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18rn7YFE3crc8hWdAKtL1XFPXHvsHVLgGUFB8bU2M 99fvLZIM8NVqCf
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
To: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>, 'GEOPRIV' <geopriv@ietf.org>
References: <C41BFCED3C088E40A8510B57B165C162BEEB57@FIESEXC007.nsn-intra.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 12:18:04 +0200
Message-ID: <00f401c94966$f544abe0$d91f8182@nsnintra.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AclFx+5EghGFCstiTIKNbzbuPWgpFgDndLCA
In-Reply-To: <C41BFCED3C088E40A8510B57B165C162BEEB57@FIESEXC007.nsn-intra.net>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.6
Subject: [Geopriv] Privacy Discussions @ IETF#73 --> CANCELED
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org

The GEOPRIV meeting went very well today. We made a lot of progress, I
believe. The GEOPRIV chairs together with Martin and Alissa were also able
to start the work on the liaison to the W3C. 

As such, I don't think we really need a meeting on Wednesday evening and
Thursday during lunch time. 

Hence, I suggest that we meet after the Wednesday plenary at the hotel bar
to have an informal chat about all sorts of things. 

Ciao
Hannes

>-----Original Message-----
>From: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org 
>[mailto:geopriv-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tschofenig, 
>Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
>Sent: 13 November, 2008 21:42
>To: GEOPRIV
>Subject: [Geopriv] Privacy Discussions @ IETF#73
>
>Hi all, 
>
>a few of us thought it would be useful to use the IETF#73 to 
>chat about geolocation privacy. 
>
>Hence, we are going to meet twice to chat about this topic: 
>* Wednesday, after the plenary (the plenary ends at 20:00). 
>* Thursday, during lunch time (11:30-13:00)
>
>We are going to chat about the bigger picture of how to 
>accomplish privacy protection in a deployment friendly way. 
>
>We had a lot of discussions around privacy triggered by the 
>recent W3C activities. We will also discuss those. 
>Additionally, we should also cover 
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-geopriv-sip-lo-r
>etransmis
>sion-00.txt,
>http://tools.ietf.org/wg/sip/draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance/
>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-barnes-geopriv-lo-sec-03.txt,
>PLING http://www.w3.org/Policy/pling/,
>and a couple of the recent publications in the privacy space. 
>I copied a few papers here:  http://www.tschofenig.priv.at/privacy/
> 
>I encourage the participants to think about what we 
>should/could do and to write a short position paper (~1 page) 
>or a short slide set. This would lead to a more structured discussion. 
>
>The meeting room still needs to be determined. 
>
>Ciao
>Hannes
>_______________________________________________
>Geopriv mailing list
>Geopriv@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv