Re: [Geopriv] IETF74 Consensus Calls

["Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom at andrew.com>]

My Responses inline.


Subject: [Geopriv] IETF74 Consensus Calls

This email is a call to confirm consensus on three questions raised at 
the GEOPRIV meeting at IETF 74, and to call for consensus on one 
additional question.  Please reply no later than Thursday, 2 April 2009.


Confirmations:

1. Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for updates and clarifications to RFC 
3693, based on draft-barnes-geopriv-lo-sec?

[AJW] YES

2. Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for a URI that describes geodetic 
location information, based on draft-mayrhofer-geopriv-geo-uri.

[AJW] YES

3.a. Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for backward-compatible fixes to the

RFC 3825 geodetic location format?

[AJW] YES

3.b Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for a new, non-backward-compatible 
DHCP format for geodetic location information?

[AJW] NO


New Question:

4. At IETF 71, there was GEOPRIV consensus to seek a milestone to 
address the problems discussed in 
draft-winterbottom-geopriv-held-identity-extensions.  Should GEOPRIV 
base that milestone on that document?

[AJW] YES

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]