Re: [Geopriv] IETF74 Consensus Calls

[<g.caron at bell.ca>]

Richard,

My hums inline...

Kind regards,

Guy

-----Message d'origine-----
De : geopriv-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:geopriv-bounces at ietf.org] De la part de Richard Barnes
Envoyé : 29 mars 2009 22:31
À : 'GEOPRIV'
Objet : [Geopriv] IETF74 Consensus Calls

This email is a call to confirm consensus on three questions raised at
the GEOPRIV meeting at IETF 74, and to call for consensus on one
additional question.  Please reply no later than Thursday, 2 April 2009.


Confirmations:

1. Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for updates and clarifications to RFC
3693, based on draft-barnes-geopriv-lo-sec?
[GC] Hum for

2. Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for a URI that describes geodetic
location information, based on draft-mayrhofer-geopriv-geo-uri.
[GC] Hum for

3.a. Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for backward-compatible fixes to the
RFC 3825 geodetic location format?

3.b Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for a new, non-backward-compatible
DHCP format for geodetic location information?


New Question:

4. At IETF 71, there was GEOPRIV consensus to seek a milestone to
address the problems discussed in
draft-winterbottom-geopriv-held-identity-extensions.  Should GEOPRIV
base that milestone on that document?
[GC] Hum for
_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv