Re: [Geopriv] IETF74 Consensus Calls

[Cullen Jennings <fluffy at cisco.com>]

On Mar 29, 2009, at 8:30 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:

> New Question:
>
> 4. At IETF 71, there was GEOPRIV consensus to seek a milestone to  
> address the problems discussed in draft-winterbottom-geopriv-held- 
> identity-extensions.  Should GEOPRIV base that milestone on that  
> document?

I'm curios about how we are going to meet our security requirements  
for these types of extensions in general before deciding how to  
proceed. I'd like to see discussion in the WG about that before I feel  
real comfortable about this direction.