Re: [Geopriv] IETF74 Consensus Calls

["Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson at andrew.com>]

1 yes
2 yes
3 a yes, b no
4 yes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: geopriv-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:geopriv-bounces at ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Richard Barnes
> Sent: Sunday, 29 March 2009 7:31 PM
> To: 'GEOPRIV'
> Subject: [Geopriv] IETF74 Consensus Calls
> 
> This email is a call to confirm consensus on three questions raised at
> the GEOPRIV meeting at IETF 74, and to call for consensus on one
> additional question.  Please reply no later than Thursday, 2 April
> 2009.
> 
> 
> Confirmations:
> 
> 1. Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for updates and clarifications to RFC
> 3693, based on draft-barnes-geopriv-lo-sec?
> 
> 2. Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for a URI that describes geodetic
> location information, based on draft-mayrhofer-geopriv-geo-uri.
> 
> 3.a. Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for backward-compatible fixes to
> the
> RFC 3825 geodetic location format?
> 
> 3.b Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for a new, non-backward-compatible
> DHCP format for geodetic location information?
> 
> 
> New Question:
> 
> 4. At IETF 71, there was GEOPRIV consensus to seek a milestone to
> address the problems discussed in
> draft-winterbottom-geopriv-held-identity-extensions.  Should GEOPRIV
> base that milestone on that document?
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]