Re: [Geopriv] IETF74 Consensus Calls

[Alissa Cooper <acooper at cdt.org>]

Just to re-cap, these were the consensus call outcomes based on list  
responses:

> Confirmations:
>
> 1. Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for updates and clarifications to  
> RFC 3693, based on draft-barnes-geopriv-lo-sec?

Yes

> 2. Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for a URI that describes geodetic  
> location information, based on draft-mayrhofer-geopriv-geo-uri.

Yes

> 3.a. Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for backward-compatible fixes to  
> the RFC 3825 geodetic location format?

Yes

> 3.b Should GEOPRIV add a milestone for a new, non-backward- 
> compatible DHCP format for geodetic location information?

No

> New Question:
>
> 4. At IETF 71, there was GEOPRIV consensus to seek a milestone to  
> address the problems discussed in draft-winterbottom-geopriv-held- 
> identity-extensions.  Should GEOPRIV base that milestone on that  
> document?


Yes