[Geopriv] draft-garcia-geopriv-indirect-publish

["James M. Polk" <jmpolk at cisco.com>]

Miguel

<I don't like sending message to 2 lists, but your ID crosses both 
the old SIP and your targeted Geopriv WGs>

I have concerns about your "Indirect Presence Publication with SIP" draft.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-garcia-geopriv-indirect-publish-01.txt

Currently, and pretty much since whatever version of
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance-01.txt 
has existed in whatever WG it happened to reside in at the time, 
Location Conveyance using SIP has included the use of PUBLISH to 
convey location as a message body, or as a location URI since about, 
or before 2005.  I fail to see or read what you want in your doc that 
cannot be covered in  SIP Location Conveyance.

I cannot figure out how you claim usage of the Geolocation is too limiting.

Additionally, I was forced to change the Location: header to the 
Geolocation: header due the SIP WG's conclusion it would be confused 
, therefore I do not believe you will be able to progress this 
forward for that additional reason as a Location header-value.

James

BTW -- you use a really old reference for the Location Conveyance 
ID.  It is on the -01 version in SIPCORE now, about to be -02.