Geographic Location-Privacy Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Announcements Archive]
- Re: [Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-geo-uri-02.txt, (continued)
- [Geopriv] event rate controls and location,
Thomson, Martin
- [Geopriv] FW: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-16.txt,
Mary Barnes
- [Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-16.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- [Geopriv] Emergency Services Workshop 6,
Winterbottom, James
- [Geopriv] RFC 5606 on Implications of 'retransmission-allowed' for SIP Location Conveyance,
rfc-editor
- [Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-lis-discovery,
DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- [Geopriv] Device vs. Target Terminology,
Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Geopriv] Device vs. Target Terminology,
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] Device vs. Target Terminology,
Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Geopriv] Device vs. Target Terminology,
Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Geopriv] Device vs. Target Terminology,
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] Device vs. Target Terminology,
Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Geopriv] Device vs. Target Terminology,
Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Geopriv] Device vs. Target Terminology,
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] Device vs. Target Terminology,
Dawson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] Device vs. Target Terminology,
Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Geopriv] Device vs. Target Terminology,
Thomson, Martin
- [Geopriv] Virtual interim mid-September,
Alissa Cooper
- [Geopriv] draft-singh-geopriv-pidf-lo-dynamic-07.txt,
Hannes Tschofenig
- [Geopriv] draft-garcia-geopriv-indirect-publish-00,
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] ISO TC 211 work and related GeoPRIV work (such as URI),
Carl Reed
- [Geopriv] FYI: Interesting tidbit on privacy, location, and social networking applications,
Carl Reed
- Re: [Geopriv] [Ecrit] Location Determination Platforms in DSL wholesale in Canada,
Francois Menard
- [Geopriv] Making progress with the responseTime in loc-filters,
Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [Geopriv] Making progress with the responseTime in loc-filters,
Thomson, Martin
[Geopriv] FW: RFC 5580 on Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS andDiameter,
Hannes Tschofenig
[Geopriv] RFC 5580 on Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS and Diameter,
rfc-editor
[Geopriv] Geo-URI: Parameter Registry really needed?,
Alexander Mayrhofer
[Geopriv] Geo URI - recap and way forward,
Alexander Mayrhofer
Re: [Geopriv] [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-location-conveyance-01.txt,
Hannes Tschofenig
[Geopriv] My concern with draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Hannes Tschofenig
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #14: uncertainty specification,
geopriv issue tracker
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #14: uncertainty specification,
geopriv issue tracker
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #13: registry for "crs" parameter,
geopriv issue tracker
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #12: Query Strings,
geopriv issue tracker
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #11: Registry for URI parameters?,
geopriv issue tracker
[Geopriv] a quick and dirty geo: URI to Google Maps resolver,
Ivan Shmakov
[Geopriv] Draft GEOPRIV minutes from IETF 75,
Richard Barnes
[Geopriv] Identity and IP address considerations,
Rosen, Brian
[Geopriv] HELD work items,
Thomson, Martin
[Geopriv] geo: URI: what about uncertainty?,
Ivan Shmakov
[Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, and notcrsURI=?,
Ivan Shmakov
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, and notcrsURI=?,
Richard Barnes
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, and notcrsURI=?,
Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, andnotcrsURI=?,
Ivan Shmakov
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, andnotcrsURI=?,
Ivan Shmakov
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, andnotcrsURI=?,
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, and notcrsURI=?,
Ivan Shmakov
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, and notcrsURI=?,
creed
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, andnotcrsURI=?,
Ivan Shmakov
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, andnotcrsURI=?,
Ivan Shmakov
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, andnotcrsURI=?,
Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, andnotcrsURI=?,
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, and notcrsURI=?,
Ivan Shmakov
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, and notcrsURI=?,
creed
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, andnotcrsURI=?,
Ivan Shmakov
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, andnotcrsURI=?,
Ted Hardie
- Re: [Geopriv] geo: URI: why crs=, and notcrsURI=?,
Ivan Shmakov
[Geopriv] Announcements,
Thomson, Martin
[Geopriv] dhcp lbyr comments,
Thomson, Martin
[Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[Geopriv] New Version Notification for draft-thomson-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-02,
Ray . Bellis
[Geopriv] IEEE Liaison,
Richard Barnes
[Geopriv] My review of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
Hannes Tschofenig
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Geopriv] My review of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] My review of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] My review of draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] My review ofdraft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
Winterbottom, James
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] My review ofdraft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] My review ofdraft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Geopriv] My review ofdraft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
Dawson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] My review ofdraft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] My review ofdraft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
Dawson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] My review ofdraft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] My review ofdraft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
Winterbottom, James
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] My review ofdraft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] My review ofdraft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
Brian Rosen
- Re: [Geopriv] My review ofdraft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
Richard Barnes
- Re: [Geopriv] My review ofdraft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05,
James M. Polk
[Geopriv] New rev of DHCP Location URI draft,
James M. Polk
[Geopriv] New location payload offered,
James M. Polk
[Geopriv] Issue in HELD, confusing device ID with entity= attribute,
James M. Polk
[Geopriv] location quality should be in the PIDF,
Brian Rosen
[Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps,
Hannes Tschofenig
[Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-policy,
Hannes Tschofenig
[Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
James M. Polk
Re: [Geopriv] Another Update to draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
James M. Polk
[Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
Rosen, Brian
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
Marc Linsner
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
Rosen, Brian
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
Gabor.Bajko
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
Allan Thomson (althomso)
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
Gabor.Bajko
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
Rosen, Brian
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
Allan Thomson (althomso)
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
Brian Rosen
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
Richard Barnes
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
Brian Rosen
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
creed
- Re: [Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior,
Karl Heinz Wolf
[Geopriv] draft-rosen-geopriv-prefix,
Rosen, Brian
[Geopriv] IETF 75 Agenda Proposal,
Richard Barnes
Re: [Geopriv] [sipcore] Confusion over target inSIP location-conveyance - and impact on ECRIT phonebcp,
Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
[Geopriv] FW: Review: draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-04,
Hannes Tschofenig
[Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-05.txt,
Hannes Tschofenig
[Geopriv] comment: draft-polk-geopriv-xml-to-tlv,
Thomson, Martin
[Geopriv] Review: draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-04,
Thomson, Martin
[Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-loc-filters-04.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps-10.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-policy-21.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-05.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
Alissa Cooper
- Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
Brian Rosen
- Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
Thomson, Martin
Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
Alissa Cooper
Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
Thomson, Martin
Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
James M. Polk
Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
Dawson, Martin
Re: [Geopriv] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt,
James M. Polk
[Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps COMMENT by Alexey,
Hannes Tschofenig
[Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps COMMENT by Robert,
Hannes Tschofenig
[Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps DISCUSS by Dan,
Hannes Tschofenig
[Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-civic-address-recommendations-03.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[Geopriv] FW: I-D Action:draft-rosen-geopriv-pidf-interior-00.txt,
Brian Rosen
[Geopriv] FW: I-D Action:draft-rosen-geopriv-prefix-00.txt,
Brian Rosen
[Geopriv] Update to the 'geo' URI scheme,
Alexander Mayrhofer
[Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-geo-uri-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[Geopriv] The next HELD work item,
Winterbottom, James
Re: [Geopriv] The next HELD work item,
Brian Rosen
[Geopriv] loc-filters additional requirements,
Thomson, Martin
Re: [Geopriv] loc-filters additional requirements,
Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] loc-filters additional requirements,
Brian Rosen
- Re: [Geopriv] loc-filters additional requirements,
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] loc-filters additional requirements,
Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Geopriv] loc-filters additional requirements,
Brian Rosen
- Re: [Geopriv] loc-filters additional requirements,
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] loc-filters additional requirements,
Brian Rosen
- Re: [Geopriv] loc-filters additional requirements,
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] loc-filters additional requirements,
Hannes Tschofenig
[Geopriv] FW: I-DAction:draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-15.txt,
Mary Barnes
[Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-15.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[Geopriv] WG Action: RECHARTER: Geographic Location/Privacy (geopriv),
IESG Secretary
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding,
geopriv issue tracker
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
geopriv issue tracker
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
James M. Polk
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support (was: Should not encourage use of "old" encoding),
creed
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support,
geopriv issue tracker
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support,
geopriv issue tracker
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support,
geopriv issue tracker
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #10: Server Version Support,
geopriv issue tracker
[Geopriv] RFC 3825bis Ticket status,
Bernard Aboba
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #9: Split of RFC 3826 Datum field into three parts,
geopriv issue tracker
[Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (affecting Sections 2, 2.1 and 6.2),
Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (affecting Sections 2, 2.1 and 6.2),
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (affecting Sections 2, 2.1 and 6.2),
Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (affecting Sections 2, 2.1 and 6.2),
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (affecting Sections 2, 2.1 and 6.2),
Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (affecting Sections 2, 2.1 and 6.2),
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (affecting Sections 2, 2.1 and 6.2),
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (affecting Sections 2, 2.1 and 6.2),
DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (affecting Sections 2, 2.1 and 6.2),
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (affecting Sections 2, 2.1 and 6.2),
DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (affecting Sections 2, 2.1 and 6.2),
Thomson, Martin
- [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Gabor.Bajko
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Gabor.Bajko
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Gabor.Bajko
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Marc Linsner
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Ted Hardie
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Gabor.Bajko
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Brian Rosen
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Gabor.Bajko
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Bernard Aboba
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation" (1 LCP?),
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Marc Linsner
- Re: [Geopriv] Issue: version "negotiation",
Stark, Barbara
Re: [Geopriv] Datum field changes in RFC 3825bis (affecting Sections 2, 2.1 and 6.2),
James M. Polk
[Geopriv] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-civic-address-recommendations-02,
McCann Peter-A001034
[Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of Geographic Location/Privacy (geopriv),
IESG Secretary
- Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of Geographic Location/Privacy (geopriv),
g.caron
- Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of Geographic Location/Privacy (geopriv),
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of Geographic Location/Privacy (geopriv),
Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of Geographic Location/Privacy (geopriv),
Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of GeographicLocation/Privacy (geopriv),
Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharter of GeographicLocation/Privacy (geopriv),
Brian Rosen
- Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharterof GeographicLocation/Privacy (geopriv),
Dawson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharterof GeographicLocation/Privacy (geopriv),
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharterof GeographicLocation/Privacy (geopriv),
Dawson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] WG Review:Recharterof GeographicLocation/Privacy (geopriv),
Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Geopriv] WGReview:Recharterof GeographicLocation/Privacy (geopriv),
Winterbottom, James
- Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharterof GeographicLocation/Privacy (geopriv),
Ray . Bellis
- Re: [Geopriv] WG Review: Recharterof GeographicLocation/Privacy (geopriv),
Brian Rosen
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude,
geopriv issue tracker
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude,
Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude,
Richard Barnes
- Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude - Guidance from the OGC Geodesy community,
Carl Reed
- Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude - Guidance from the OGC Geodesy community,
Richard Barnes
- Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude - Guidance from the OGC Geodesy community,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude - Guidance from the OGC Geodesy community,
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude - Guidance from the OGC Geodesy community,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude - Guidance from the OGC Geodesy community,
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude - Guidance from the OGC Geodesy community,
James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude - Guidance from the OGC Geodesy community,
Thomson, Martin
- Message not available
- Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude - Guidance from the OGC Geodesy community,
James M. Polk
Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude - Guidance from the OGC Geodesy community,
Carl Reed
Re: [Geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude - Guidance from the OGC Geodesy community,
Ted Hardie
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude,
geopriv issue tracker
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude,
geopriv issue tracker
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #8: Altitude type of 0 == no altitude,
geopriv issue tracker
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #7: Identity CRS URN for each "datum",
geopriv issue tracker
[Geopriv] Document Action: 'Implications of 'retransmission-allowed' for SIP Location Conveyance' to Informational RFC,
The IESG
[Geopriv] I-D Action:draft-ietf-geopriv-rfc3825bis-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[Geopriv] Protocol Action: 'Carrying Location Objects in RADIUS and Diameter' to Proposed Standard,
The IESG
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #6: Authorship,
geopriv issue tracker
[Geopriv] draft-ietf-geopriv-geo-uri-00 brief comments,
Thomson, Martin
[Geopriv] Update to uncertainty and confidence informational draft,
Thomson, Martin
[Geopriv] GEOPRIV Minutes from Virtual Interim, 21 May 2009,
Richard Barnes
[Geopriv] Updated residential gateway document,
Thomson, Martin
[Geopriv] Plan for 3825bis,
Richard Barnes
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #5: Client guidance about the datum field,
geopriv issue tracker
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #5: Client guidance about the datum field,
geopriv issue tracker
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #5: Client guidance about the datum field,
geopriv issue tracker
Re: [Geopriv] [geopriv] #5: Client guidance about the datum field,
geopriv issue tracker
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #4: Uncertainty semantic for resolution fields,
geopriv issue tracker
[Geopriv] [geopriv] #3: GML Mapping,
geopriv issue tracker
[Geopriv] HELD ResponseTime parameter with value emergencyRouting,
Rosen, Brian
Mail converted by MHonArc
