> Additionally there was some discussion on 'what is important to > capture' in the XML format. I believe Dan had also mentioned (perhaps > not in the WG meeting) that there would be a common/available toolset > to convert from MRT -> XML and XML -> MRT, so in the case where you > have legacy data stores you could plan to process via a common > pipeline regardless of the data format you choose going forward. heas has already written MRT -> 'sh ip bgp' (that's how we're generating 'sh ip bgp' format data these days). So if we have XML->MRT, then we can generate all formats in use today from the XML. That would be a great step forward. Dave
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature