[GROW] current state of BMP implementations?
John Kemp <kemp@network-services.uoregon.edu> Tue, 05 November 2013 17:32 UTC
Return-Path: <kemp@network-services.uoregon.edu>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5EA11E80F9 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:32:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RYM4FLJ5qWnF for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:32:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from network-services.uoregon.edu (vl-60-gw.uoregon.edu [IPv6:2001:468:d01:3c::80df:3c34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380BB11E80D9 for <grow@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:32:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-bc61.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-bc61.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.188.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by network-services.uoregon.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rA5HWHLu012631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <grow@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:32:19 -0800
Message-ID: <52792BA0.5030901@network-services.uoregon.edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 09:32:16 -0800
From: John Kemp <kemp@network-services.uoregon.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: grow@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [GROW] current state of BMP implementations?
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:32:20 -0000
Can anyone summarize the current state of the Juniper or Quagga work on BMP? We have the opportunity to work on either of those platforms and would like to get our feet wet working with the tools. Any guidance is appreciated. Thanks, John Kemp RouteViews kemp@network-services.uoregon.edu
- [GROW] current state of BMP implementations? John Kemp
- Re: [GROW] current state of BMP implementations? Pedro Torres
- Re: [GROW] current state of BMP implementations? Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [GROW] current state of BMP implementations? John Kemp
- Re: [GROW] current state of BMP implementations? Stephen Stuart
- Re: [GROW] current state of BMP implementations? Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie)
- Re: [GROW] current state of BMP implementations? Stephen Stuart
- Re: [GROW] current state of BMP implementations? Thomas Mangin
- Re: [GROW] current state of BMP implementations? Robert Raszuk
- Re: [GROW] current state of BMP implementations? Thomas Mangin
- Re: [GROW] current state of BMP implementations? Stephen Stuart
- Re: [GROW] current state of BMP implementations? Thomas Mangin