thanks Thomas, Hannes, and Peter -- I've incorp'd the notion of "scope" in the 
below draft charter.

thoughts?

=JeffH
------

Charter for HASMAT -- HTTP Application Security Minus Authentication and
Transport WG

Problem Statement

Although modern Web applications are built on top of HTTP, they provide
rich functionality and have requirements beyond the original vision of
static web pages.  HTTP, and the applications built on it, have evolved
organically.  Over the past few years, we have seen a proliferation of
AJAX-based web applications (AJAX being shorthand for asynchronous
JavaScript and XML), as well as Rich Internet Applications (RIAs), based
on so-called Web 2.0 technologies.  These applications bring both
luscious eye-candy and convenient functionality, e.g. social networking,
to their users, making them quite compelling.  At the same time, we are
seeing an increase in attacks against these applications and their
underlying technologies.

The list of attacks is long and includes Cross-Site-Request Forgery
(CSRF)-based attacks, content-sniffing cross-site-scripting (XSS)
attacks, attacks against browsers supporting anti-XSS policies,
clickjacking attacks, malvertising attacks, as well as man-in-the-middle
(MITM) attacks against "secure" (e.g. Transport Layer Security
(TLS/SSL)-based) web sites along with distribution of the tools to carry
out such attacks (e.g. sslstrip).


Objectives and Scope

With the arrival of new attacks the introduction of new web security
indicators, security techniques, and policy communication mechanisms
have sprinkled throughout the various layers of the Web and HTTP.

The goal of this working group is to standardize a small number of
selected specifications that have proven to improve security of Internet
Web applications. The requirements guiding the work will be taken from
the Web application and Web security communities.  Initial work will be
limited to the following topics:

    - Same origin policy, as discussed in draft-abarth-origin

    - Strict transport security, as discussed in
      draft-hodges-stricttransportsec (to be submitted shortly)

    - Media type sniffing, as discussed in draft-abarth-mime-sniff


This working group will work closely with IETF Apps Area WGs (such as
HYBI, HTTPstate, and HTTPbis), as well as W3C WebApps working group(s).


Out of Scope

As noted in this working group's title, this working group's scope does
not include working on HTTP Authentication nor underlying transport
(secure or not) topics. So, for example, these items are out-of-scope
for this WG:

    - Replacements for BASIC and DIGEST authentication

    - New transports (e.g. SCTP and the like)


Deliverables

1. A document illustrating the security problems Web applications are
facing and listing design requirements.  This document shall be
Informational.

2. A selected set of technical specifications documenting deployed
HTTP-based Web security solutions.
These documents shall be Standards Track.

Goals and Milestones

Oct 2010    Submit "HTTP Application Security Problem Statement and
             Requirements" as initial WG item.
Oct 2010    Submit "Media Type Sniffing" as initial WG item.
Oct 2010    Submit "Web Origin Concept" as initial WG item.
Oct 2010    Submit "Strict Transport Security" as initial WG item.
Feb 2011    Submit "HTTP Application Security Problem Statement and
             Requirements" to the IESG for consideration as an
             Informational RFC.
Mar 2011    Submit "Media Type Sniffing" to the IESG for consideration
             as a Standards Track RFC.
Mar 2011    Submit "Web Origin Concept" to the IESG for consideration as
             a Standards Track RFC.
Mar 2011    Submit "Strict Transport Security" to the IESG for
             consideration as a Standards Track RFC.
Apr 2011    Possible re-chartering