Re: [Hipsec] draft-ietf-hip-native-api-09-pre

["Ahrenholz, Jeffrey M" <jeffrey.m.ahrenholz at boeing.com>]

>> Yes I think this HIP_IS_HIT() macro would be helpful.
> 
> Ok. Then we'll have one function for testing the local HITs 
> and a second one for testing both local and peer HITs. Is this ok or 
> should they be unified?

seems like separate functions/macros are OK since sockaddr_is_srcaddr()
attempts to align with inet6_is_srcaddr()

the HIP_IS_HIT() macro I would think of as being much simpler, just
checks for the presence of a HIT prefix similar to the
IN6_IS_ADDR_LINKLOCAL() macro

-Jeff