Re: [Hipsec] Building the first list of to Standards changes

To: Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Building the first list of to Standards changes
From: Miika Komu <miika.komu at hiit.fi>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:40:10 +0300
Cc: hipsec at ietf.org
Delivered-to: hipsec at core3.amsl.com
In-reply-to: <4A927D69.60402 at hiit.fi>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4A72AF52.90603 at htt-consult.com> <4A927D69.60402 at hiit.fi>
Reply-to: miika.komu at hiit.fi
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)

Miika Komu wrote:

Hi,

Robert Moskowitz wrote:

Hi,

Compressing Transport checksums
   New HIP option?


can you elaborate on this?

if this comment was about RoHC, Michael Richardson already mentioned onRG mailing list that BEET is better than it.

References:
- [Hipsec] Building the first list of to Standards changes
  - From: Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [Hipsec] Building the first list of to Standards changes
  - From: Miika Komu