[Hipsec] draft-ietf-hip-cert-02-pre00

[Varjonen Samu <samu.varjonen at hiit.fi>]

Hi,

Here is the pre-version of the hip-cert draft. It has been living a 
quiet life on the list. We have been asking for comments on the list 
before and after IETF 75 (Stockholm). There seems to be little or no 
comments about the draft. The new version contains bigger editorial 
changes, change in the default cert and added type numbers.

Now I ask you to read and comment the draft.

http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/sklvarjo/draft-ietf-hip-cert-02-pre00.txt

Few topics for the comments:

- Is the draft sufficient? Do we need to specify something more? Is 
something important missing?

- Is SPKI the right choice for the default format? X.509 is more widely 
deployed and has better support vs. SPKI is simpler but has less 
support. In the pre-version I already changed X.509s as the default, 
because the X.509s are commonly used in the wild and SPKIs are more like 
research curiosity(?).

- Are the hash and URL encodings needed? At least with on-path 
middleboxes they are problematic.

- Are the examples in the appendixes sufficient?

- Should we start the move from a draft to experimental RFC?

BR,
Samu Varjonen