[Hipsec] iot for hip

[Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf at gmail.com>]

Hi Pascal, 

I briefly went through the document. IoT was probably missing this kind of document with a problem statement, so that we can understand why HIP is the more accurate solution to deal with IoT.

Although I am not an expert on IoT, I am not convinced HIP is the only single  protocol to consider. With Security related issues maybe  IPsec suite protocols as well as ID - IP address binding protocols (like CGA) could also solve some of the issues.

IoT to some extends looks to have similarities with what is 6lowpan. Maybe we should explicitly mention why IoT cannot be included in 6lowpan.

Regards, 

Daniel

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Pascal Urien <pascal.urien at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Every Body,

 

During the last WG meeting in Stockholm we discuss about a possible WG item addressing HIP for internet of things

 

I would like a slot during the next meeting at Hiroshima, in order to preset the draft draft-urien-hip-iot that tries to start a woork with HIP and IOT

 

 

Best Regards

 

Pascal

 

 

Filename:          draft-urien-hip-iot
Version:           00
Staging URL:       http://www.ietf.org/staging/draft-urien-hip-iot-00.txt
Title:             HIP for IoT
Creation_date:     2009-10-16
WG ID:             Indvidual Submission
Number_of_pages: 6
Abstract:
The goal of this document is to analyze issues raised by the
deployment of the Internet Of Things, and to propose a framework
based on an Identity Layer such as the HIP protocol.

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
Hipsec at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

-- 
Daniel Migault
Orange Labs -- Security
+33 6 70 72 69 58