Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-grundemann-homenet-hipnet-01.txt

Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com> Fri, 15 March 2013 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DA911E80D1 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RKlgC+aDtW8N for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC36411E80A5 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-b7faf6d00000096b-81-51439d31b2b9
Received: from EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.96]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id E2.99.02411.23D93415; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 23:14:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB101.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.118]) by EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.96]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:14:09 -0400
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Thread-Topic: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-grundemann-homenet-hipnet-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHOIDd64z80v7Fj10isXCa0IcvoC5inl3GA
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:14:08 +0000
Message-ID: <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE470F9002@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
References: <43238C9F8B23DA44B42A78D0129283E017FC9051@EXCHANGE.cablelabs.com> <1DB0FF39-44E7-4ABF-AF75-800067D17884@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|e40f4a136bed8efd88ac0a210c788e60p2CM9K03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|1DB0FF39-44E7-4ABF-AF75-800067D17884@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|e40f4a136bed8efd88ac0a210c788e60p2CM9K03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|1DB0FF39-44E7-4ABF-AF75-800067D17884@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.134]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4009E0E4F2B75C4ABDC6C5BC503E8ABE@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrMLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPgq7RXOdAg7M75C3eLzrEYnFoz3M2 ByaPv+tcPZYs+ckUwBTFZZOSmpNZllqkb5fAlbHo6xX2goUCFTfvTWZpYJzL28XIwSEhYCLR Py+mi5ETyBSTuHBvPVsXIxeHkMARRokNLx8xgSSEBJYzSvR/8gOx2QR0JJ4/+scMYosIKEu8 nfefEWQOs4C+xP2f4iBhYYEYidObvjFBlMRKnDv+nwXCNpL4vWIZI4jNIqAq0Xf/OlicV8Bb Yt3b9cwQqxqZJPZtVgS5gVOglVFi87KHYEWMQMd9P7UGbCizgLjErSfzmSCOFpBYsuc8M4Qt KvHy8T9WCFtZYsmT/SwQ9ToSC3Z/YoOwrSXufNkIZWtLLFv4mhniCEGJkzOfsExgFJ+FZMUs JO2zkLTPQtI+C0n7AkbWVYwcpcWpZbnpRoabGIERdUyCzXEH44JPlocYpTlYlMR5Q10vBAgJ pCeWpGanphakFsUXleakFh9iZOLglGpgzJQ8Y1WyN6WNJ+99gcuBmjv3L38/a1T5vMume9Yi Do4Nf8qDNBkW+et4r9VMPlK5jfWJrZpfec/X0vl71Dj35FucMGTlmSK5tsAuoDOTV/OiAqv1 i+2fCx+t8tJOuaP2zpBx2tmseW637Ndfn9D7lUly5fdm/sPunJN/8P8VklSbM+3DjnI1JZbi jERDLeai4kQAFkRqx3YCAAA=
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-grundemann-homenet-hipnet-01.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:14:11 -0000

I think the draft is a bit optimistic with respect to its claim of satisfying homenet requirements. For example, there is a very limited set of multi-homing topologies where the internal routers don't find themselves asking, "Which way is up?". Additionally, without source routing, I don't see how ingress filtering can be avoided. Perhaps multi-homing should be removed. 
Thanks,
Acee 

On Mar 13, 2013, at 6:09 PM, Tim Chown wrote:

> 
> On 26 Feb 2013, at 15:46, Chris Grundemann <C.Grundemann@cablelabs.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hail Homenet,
>> 
>> FYI - We have updated our "HIPnet" draft. This -01 is a minor update,
>> which includes almost exclusively editorial fixes. We have taken note of
>> all feedback received thus far, both on and off list, and will work to
>> incorporate that feedback in further revisions as it makes sense.
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
> It's good to see a 'lightweight' alternative being put forward, with a demo here.
> 
> From the arch text point of view I agree it's largely compatible with -07, assuming the text about 'routing protocol' were rewritten to 'routing functionality', since you install routes automatically up/down.
> 
> The two points that are partly met are the prefix utilisation efficiency (since it's hierarchical DHCP-PD) and whether arbitrary topologies are supported (given the use of ND in a 'spanning tree' like approach). But it does tick a lot of boxes, and uses existing protocols.  Topics such as realms and borders, and naming/SD are orthogonal to how the prefixes and routing is configured.
> 
> The interesting question for the WG is how such an approach could interoperate with (say) a homenet solution using zOSPF. Are the homenet solutions 'all or nothing', or is there something we could do now to improve the chances of future interoperability if hipnet is deployed now?
> 
> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet