On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Greg Wilkins<gregw at webtide.com> wrote: > I've not planned to support a downgrade to HTTP. That's fine, the pattern of synchronous control followed by asynchronous data is simple, and matches the real world use cases I've seen. This is naturally handled by two protocols, and HTTP -> BWTP feels exactly right. Presumably we could do a kind of BWTP emulation over HTTP, for prototyping or proof of concept. FWIW, I've been trying to get this pattern into AMQP (www.amqp.org) for about two years, without success. > a wiki would be better than google docs, because it would have > history. > > I've created a site at http://bwtp.wikidot.com > You can join at http://bwtp.wikidot.com/system:join > and the password is MustHaveMeta You might want to add some legal framing so that contributions are properly reusable. Digistan.org has a template (spec.digistan.org), which we used for restms.org. It just avoids the problem that a contributor 'accidentally' adds something they then patent. There is also a legal package at packages.wikidot.com, which may be sufficient. Cheers, Pieter
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.