[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [hybi] moving forward on HTTP extensions

From: Pieter Hintjens <ph at imatix.com>
To: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto at ericsson.com>
Cc: hybi at ietf.org
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:06:46 +0200
In-reply-to: <4A3A36B5.3040802 at ericsson.com>
References: <4A3923A2.7020200 at stpeter.im> <5821ea240906171136h17bdc1ebx7ede535b1fd6dbf0 at mail.gmail.com> <4A3A23D4.2080402 at ericsson.com> <5821ea240906180440u4d33a9bn861bb8bc50a46fb5 at mail.gmail.com> <4A3A36B5.3040802 at ericsson.com>

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Salvatore
Loreto<salvatore.loreto at ericsson.com> wrote:

> any opinions on potential future work items for bidirectional HTTP that are
> listed in the draft?

I am not really competent to give opinions except that (a) the work
items seem to make sense, but (b) it may be more pragmatic to solve
some of them outside HTTP, e.g. with BWTP.

> that briefly is upgrade from HTTP to a different bidirectional protocol.
> So both the protocols do not fit at all into this draft.

Understood.

-Pieter

References:
- [hybi] moving forward on HTTP extensions
  - From: Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [hybi] moving forward on HTTP extensions
  - From: Pieter Hintjens
- Re: [hybi] moving forward on HTTP extensions
  - From: Pieter Hintjens
- Re: [hybi] moving forward on HTTP extensions
  - From: Salvatore Loreto

Prev by Date: Re: [hybi] moving forward on HTTP extensions
Next by Date: Re: [hybi] moving forward on HTTP extensions
Previous by thread: Re: [hybi] moving forward on HTTP extensions
Next by thread: Re: [hybi] moving forward on HTTP extensions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.