Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Salvatore Loreto wrote:
<snip>
In particular, the working group will liaison with the W3C WebApps working group around the WebSockets protocol and the requirements to support the WebSocket API; if agreed by both parties, the HyBi working group may take on prime responsibility on the specification of the WebSockets protocol.We should also liason with the WHATWG, since that's where most of the WebSockets work has happened. (The W3C Web Apps working group hasn't worked on the protocol at all, and they already liase with the WHATWG for the API.)
Hi Ian, thanks for you comments, your are definitively right! what about the following text? In particular, the working group will liaison with:- the W3C WebApps working group around the requirements to support the WebSocket API; - the WHATWG around the WebSockets protocol if agreed by both parties, the HyBi working group may take on prime responsibility on the specification of the WebSockets protocol.
one question: how IETF can become aware if WHATWG agrees or not? /Sal
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.