[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [hybi] Comments on draft-loreto-http-bidirectional-01

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson at andrew.com>
Cc: "hybi at ietf.org" <hybi at ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:58:33 +0100
In-reply-to: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F0F339546 at SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
References: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F0F339546 at SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>

Thomson, Martin wrote:

==Two connection limit:
No mention is made on why this limit exists; it's an important concern that is not captured elsewhere
I also note that httpbis still haven't decided on whether this limit will be lifted: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/131>
...

We lifted it in the lasted (08) drafts:<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/715>


BR, Julian

References:
- [hybi] Comments on draft-loreto-http-bidirectional-01
  - From: Thomson, Martin

Prev by Date: [hybi] Comments on draft-loreto-http-bidirectional-01
Next by Date: [hybi] wrt security concerns with socket-capable browsers
Previous by thread: [hybi] Comments on draft-loreto-http-bidirectional-01
Next by thread: Re: [hybi] Comments on draft-loreto-http-bidirectional-01
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.