[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [hybi] US-ASCII vs. ASCII in Web Socket Protocol



Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, SM wrote:
At 16:30 01-02-10, Ian Hickson wrote:
I used "ANSI_X3.4-1968" because that's the canonical name for US-ASCII,
and I used RFC1345 because that's the canonical reference. If you disagree
with these choices, please update the IANA registry.
Julian Reschke is correct; RFC 1345 should not be used as a normative reference. Please use the reference that he suggested ([ANSI.X3-4.1986]).

Again, I'm just using what the IANA uses. If the IANA's reference is out of date, then please update the IANA registry. I've no intention of playing reference hot potato, where every 3 months the "best reference" changes and I have to update all the references.

RFC1345 works fine as a reference for the purposes of the Web Socket spec, anyway.

RFC 1345 never was the "best reference"; actually, as far as I can tell, it never has been used as a normative reference for US-ASCII in *any* RFC.

BR, Julian

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.