Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, SM wrote:At 16:30 01-02-10, Ian Hickson wrote:Julian Reschke is correct; RFC 1345 should not be used as a normative reference. Please use the reference that he suggested ([ANSI.X3-4.1986]).I used "ANSI_X3.4-1968" because that's the canonical name for US-ASCII, and I used RFC1345 because that's the canonical reference. If you disagree with these choices, please update the IANA registry.Again, I'm just using what the IANA uses. If the IANA's reference is out of date, then please update the IANA registry. I've no intention of playing reference hot potato, where every 3 months the "best reference" changes and I have to update all the references.RFC1345 works fine as a reference for the purposes of the Web Socket spec, anyway.
RFC 1345 never was the "best reference"; actually, as far as I can tell, it never has been used as a normative reference for US-ASCII in *any* RFC.
BR, Julian
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.