Re: [hybi] WS URLs

sorry, I missed the posts by Peter and Julian

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi/current/msg09243.html

So 1. - 4. are invalid, and 5. - 8. are valid?

What about failing the handshake vs ignoring a fragment component (introduced via non-escaped #)?

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: hybi-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hybi-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von
> Tobias Oberstein
> Gesendet: Samstag, 22. Oktober 2011 23:40
> An: hybi@ietf.org
> Betreff: [hybi] WS URLs
> 
> 2 short questions .. first one is part of http://bugs.python.org/issue13244
> 
> Which of the following URLs are valid WS URLs?
> 
> 1. ws://example.com/something#somewhere
> 2. ws://example.com/something#somewhere/
> 3. ws://example.com/something#somewhere/foo
> 4. ws://example.com/something?query=foo#bar
> 5. ws://example.com/something%23somewhere
> 6. ws://example.com/something%23somewhere/
> 7. ws://example.com/something%23somewhere/foo
> 8. ws://example.com/something?query=foo%23bar
> 
> %23 = # "percentage escaped"
> 
> Hybi-17 spec:
> 
> "Fragment identifiers are meaningless in the context of WebSocket URIs, and
> MUST NOT be used on these URIs.  The character "#" in URIs MUST be
> escaped as %23 if used as part of the query component."
> 
> "path = <path-abempty, defined in [RFC3986], Section 3.3>"
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986:
> 
> "The path is terminated by the first question mark ("?") or number sign ("#")
> character, or by the end of the URI."
> 
> ==
> 
> When an invalid WS URLs is received in the client request during opening
> handshake, how is the server supposed to react?
> 
> Fail the handshake (i.e. http 400 Bad request), or "ignore" invalid parts (like
> fragment component)?
> _______________________________________________
> hybi mailing list
> hybi@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi